Rated Care Homes

Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited

I

Inadequate

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 8 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Inadequate, like this one.

Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, Kent

Rated Inadequate in October 2026, down from Good.

Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bridge Haven (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Highfield Care Home (Good, 1.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Bridge Haven Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Highfield Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  3. G
    Kingston House Good, 2.1 miles away
  4. –
    The Beeches Residential Home Not yet rated, 2.2 miles away
  5. G
    Willow Tree Lodge Good, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Patrixbourne

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 October 2026 (assessment visit 29 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 2 July to 23 July 2026. Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited is a residential home for people who require personal care. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting 21 people, some who were living with dementia.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The quality of the service had deteriorated since our last inspection. We found significant shortfalls, with 7 breaches of regulation to safe care, medicines management, governance of the service, staffing, dignity consent, responding to complaints and person centred care. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward. Potential risks to people’s health and welfare had not always been assessed. Staff did not have detailed guidance to mitigate risks including how to de-escalate incidents of anxiety and distress. Staff had not always used assessment tools to identify continued risk to people’s health. Staff had not accurately recorded incidents to support learning, and external health professionals make decisions.

Staffing levels had been calculated using a dependency tool. However, the calculations had not considered all areas of people’s support, such as emotional support. There were not always enough staff on duty to provide people’s care and staff were expected to complete all the laundry and cleaning at night along with their care role. Staff were not always covered during leave or sickness.

The registered manager did not manage the service on a day to day basis; this was the role of the deputy manager. The registered manager completed monthly reports about the service. An action plan had been put in place but there were no timescales when shortfalls had been identified and when the action should be completed by. The registered manager had identified shortfalls such as care plans were not detailed but the action taken had not been effective and the shortfalls remained.

The culture within the service was not open and transparent, concerns had not always been investigated and acted upon. The registered manager and provider had not used complaints as learning opportunities to drive improvement. The registered manager had not notified CQC of safeguarding incidents as required. Medicines had not always been managed safely.

Staff had not always promoted people’s dignity or supported them in a person centred way. The registered manager had not acted to ensure received dignified care.

This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.

  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, the ways people’s medicines were managed safely and staffing.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person centred care and responding to complaints.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 29 October 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 29 October 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 29 October 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 29 October 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Nadia Paneandee
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 24 February 2022. Latest assessment published 29 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03781616 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited.
When was Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited was published on 29 October 2026.
Who runs Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited?
Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited is run by Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited.
What is Saxon Lodge Residential Home Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 29 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01227 831737
Address
30 Western Avenue, Bridge, Canterbury, CT4 5LT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bridge Haven (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Highfield Care Home (Good, 1.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Bridge Haven Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Highfield Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  3. G
    Kingston House Good, 2.1 miles away
  4. –
    The Beeches Residential Home Not yet rated, 2.2 miles away
  5. G
    Willow Tree Lodge Good, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Patrixbourne