The Orchard
- Care home
- 10 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2010
- Finchampstead, Wokingham, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in October 2026.
This month
The latest rating was published.
34 of 41
rated care homes in Wokingham are rated Good, like this one.
The Orchard: inspection record
Rated Good in October 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Copper Beech Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Eretz Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Kadimah Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Pamela Barnett Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G The Elms Good, less than 0.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 October 2026 (assessment visit 18 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of inspection: 10 September 2026 to 30 September 2026. The inspection of this location was prompted due to the historic rating. The Orchard is a care home registered to provide personal care and accommodation for up 10 people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of the inspection, the service was supporting 10 people. The accommodation was provided within a two-storey dwelling which was located on a village style development with other homes lived in by people with care and support needs, which is a campus setting.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found people were supported in accordance with this guidance. The provider ensured people were supported to access communities beyond the location and recognised the importance of people having access to a variety of people, facilities and opportunities. For example, visiting shops in the local community, bowling, and outings. The model of care supported people to be independent as they were able to be.
At our previous inspection, the provider was rated as good. At this inspection, the rating has remained good. Risks to people relating to their care had been assessed and staff understood how to support people to remain safe. People received their medicines as prescribed and the home environment was well maintained. Staff were recruited safely and received appropriate training and support. The provider worked with health and social care professionals and relatives to support people to live healthier lives. Staff treated people with kindness, dignity and respect. The provider understood and responded to people’s needs. The provider’s ethos towards care was embedded across the workforce. All those involved were committed to improving people’s lives. People’s care was person centred, with staff facilitating positive outcomes for people, maximising their health and wellbeing, and being supported to live life to the full. The provider monitored quality and risks in the service and acted when shortfalls were identified.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Emine Holden
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 16 September 2017. Latest assessment published 6 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Norwood RavenswoodBrand: Norwood
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Charity number
- 1059050
Norwood Ravenswood runs 19 services in England, 13 of them in the South East. 19 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Norwood Ravenswood
- O Norwood - 30 Old Church Lane Outstanding. Care home, Harrow, London
- O Norwood - 60 Carlton Avenue Outstanding. Care home, Harrow, London
- O The Tager Centre Outstanding. Care home, Wokingham
- G Broadway House Good. Home care, Harrow, London
Getting help from Wokingham Borough Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Wokingham Borough Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 365 1234
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Wokingham Borough Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does The Orchard provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Orchard as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does The Orchard have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at The Orchard.
- When was The Orchard last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Orchard was published on 6 October 2026.
- Who runs The Orchard?
- The Orchard is run by Norwood Ravenswood. It runs 19 services in England, 13 of them in the South East.
- What is The Orchard's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 October 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01344 755582
- Address
- Ravenswood Village, Nine Mile Ride, Crowthorne, RG45 6BQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Copper Beech Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Eretz Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Kadimah Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Pamela Barnett Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- G The Elms Good, less than 0.1 miles away