Rated Care Homes

Dean House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in April 2026.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Dean House: inspection record

Care home, 27 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in April 2026.

Dean House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    White Lodge Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    The Martlets Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Baytrees Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Green Willow Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Rustington Hall Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in East Preston

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 April 2026 (assessment visit 25 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 10 – 31 March 2026. Dean House is a residential care home providing support to people with a variety of health conditions, including frailty of old age and dementia.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had developed a culture of learning when accidents and incidents occurred. Safe systems ensured staff worked collaboratively with a range of professionals to provide consistent and co-ordinated care. Safeguarding requirements were met, and any instances of abuse or suspected abuse were reported as needed. People’s risks were identified, assessed and managed safely. The home provided a safe environment which was clean, with procedures to resist and manage any infection risks. Staffing levels were sufficient to meet people’s care and support needs, and staff completed a range of training in line with their roles. Staff were recruited safely. Medicines were ordered, stored, administered and disposed of safely.

People’s needs were assessed before they moved into the home, and a range of monitoring tools was used to support the care they received from staff. A variety of health and social care professionals supported people to live healthier lives, and to achieve good outcomes. People’s consent to care and support was routinely sought by staff.

People were cared for by kind and compassionate staff who knew them well; their dignity was respected. People were encouraged with their independence and their immediate needs were responded to promptly. There were no restrictions on people receiving visits. The home supported staff with their wellbeing and regular supervisions, enabling staff to make suggestions or voice any concerns.

People received person-centred care that catered for their likes, dislikes and preferences. Care plans provided information for staff about how people wished to be cared for. Staff completed training in equality and diversity and demonstrated their understanding in practice. Staff completed training in end of life care.

The culture of the home shaped the environment, the quality of care and daily life for people and staff. A positive culture had been developed that was person-centred and focused on giving people dignity and choice on what was important to them. A robust system of audits monitored the home overall and was used to drive improvements.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 12 March 2022. Latest assessment published 22 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Dean House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Dean House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Dean House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at Dean House.
When was Dean House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Dean House was published on 22 April 2026.
Who runs Dean House?
Dean House is run by Miss Maria Ann Eagland & Mr Dean Talbot Williams.
What is Dean House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
01903 784217
Address
67 Sea Lane, East Preston, Littlehampton, BN16 1NB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    White Lodge Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    The Martlets Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Baytrees Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Green Willow Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Rustington Hall Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in East Preston