Rated Care Homes

The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 12 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 306 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Good, like this one.

The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 112 beds, Lancashire

Rated Good in October 2025, up from Requires improvement.

The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    St Mary's Gate Euxton Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. RI
    Jah-Jireh Charity Homes Leyland Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Teamcare Limited t/a Highcliffe Residential Home Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
  4. –
    Astley View Care Home Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Willowbank Rest Home Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 October 2025 (assessment visit 15 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 24 – 26 September 2025. The Lodge – Dementia Care with Nursing is a large care home that supports older people, people who may be living with dementia and people with mental health needs. We undertook the assessment to check compliance against breaches of the legal regulations at the previous assessment in December 2023.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Steps needed to be taken to strengthen some aspects of governance, and to ensure guidance about how to manage risks was clear. The facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were clean and well-maintained. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

Staff did not always make sure assessments of people’s needs were up to date, however staff knew people’s needs well and ensured the care met their needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff and relevant people took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were usually treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. Staff treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People were usually involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. Staff worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Managers did not always assess and mitigate risk and learn lessons from incidents. Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture for the service. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, and good governance. Some improvements had been made, and the provider was no longer in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment. Not enough improvement had been made in the legal regulation relating to good governance, and the provider continued to be in breach of this regulation.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 15 October 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Hayley Rowson de Vares
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

14 inspection reports, latest 7 February 2024. Latest assessment published 15 October 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Oakbridge Retirement Villages LLPBrand: Humberside Independent Care Association Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
OC325006 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 112 beds at The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing.
When was The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing was published on 15 October 2025.
Who runs The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing?
The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing is run by Oakbridge Retirement Villages LLP.
What is The Lodge - Dementia Care with Nursing's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 October 2025.

Contact

Phone
01772 625000
Address
Buckshaw Retirement Village, Oakbridge Drive, Buckshaw Village, Chorley, PR7 7EP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    St Mary's Gate Euxton Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. RI
    Jah-Jireh Charity Homes Leyland Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Teamcare Limited t/a Highcliffe Residential Home Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
  4. –
    Astley View Care Home Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Willowbank Rest Home Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire