Rated Care Homes

Charnwood Lodge

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Good in 2016, most recently Good in May 2025.

  • 17 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 116 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Good, like this one.

Charnwood Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 17 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Good in May 2025.

Charnwood Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    362 Park Road Good, 1.5 miles away
  2. G
    Gilburn Good, 1.9 miles away
  3. G
    Marwood Residential Home Good, 1.9 miles away
  4. G
    Woodthorpe Lodge Good, 2.1 miles away
  5. G
    Westfield House Good, 2.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Shepshed

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 May 2025 (assessment visit 3 March 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 18 to 28 March 2025. The service is a residential care home providing support to adults with a learning disability, mental health condition, physical disability and autistic people. The service was supporting 17 people at the time of our assessment. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service was meeting the underpinning principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider had a good learning culture where staff understood and managed risks and people were kept safe. Risks were assessed and regularly reviewed to ensure measures remained effective and appropriate. Staff understood people’s emotional communication and responded effectively to signs of distress, anxiety and frustration. Leaders and staff followed the least restrictive options to keep people safe and ensured lessons were learnt and shared through de-brief processes. The facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were clean and well-maintained andany risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervisions to maintain high-quality care and meet people’s individual needs. Improvements were needed in some areas of medicines management and the registered manager implemented these immediately during and after our inspection visits.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy and were supported to plan and shop for their meals where appropriate. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff ensured people had choice and control and consented to their care. They followed processes to ensure those important to people, and those involved in their care, took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People were supported to identify and achieve meaningful goals and aspirations and enabled to be as independent as possible. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way which helped to reduce people’s distress. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

The provider had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust; this was clearly understood and embraced by staff. People and relatives had confidence in the management team and staff consistently described them as approachable, supportive, effective and excellent. Managers were visible, knowledgeable and helped staff develop in their roles. They clearly knew and understood people well. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. They described a culture where diversity was embraced, supported and celebrated and everyone was treated equally. Managers worked with other agencies and the local community to deliver the best possible care and outcomes for people. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff encouraged and supported to try new ideas.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Keighley Mann
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 6 December 2019. Latest assessment published 21 May 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Lansdowne Road LimitedBrand: Priory Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02115380 (opens Companies House)

Lansdowne Road Limited runs 3 services, all in the East Midlands. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Lansdowne Road Limited

  1. G
    Halifax Drive Good. Care home, Leicester
  2. G
    Lansdowne Road (67-71) Good. Care home, Leicester

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Charnwood Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Charnwood Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Charnwood Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 17 beds at Charnwood Lodge.
When was Charnwood Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Charnwood Lodge was published on 21 May 2025.
Who runs Charnwood Lodge?
Charnwood Lodge is run by Lansdowne Road Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is Charnwood Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 21 May 2025.

Contact

Phone
01509 890184
Address
Woodhouse Lane, Nanpantan, Loughborough, LE11 3YG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    362 Park Road Good, 1.5 miles away
  2. G
    Gilburn Good, 1.9 miles away
  3. G
    Marwood Residential Home Good, 1.9 miles away
  4. G
    Woodthorpe Lodge Good, 2.1 miles away
  5. G
    Westfield House Good, 2.1 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Shepshed