Rated Care Homes

Simon Marks Court

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 17 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 104 of 138

    rated care homes in Leeds are rated Good, like this one.

Simon Marks Court: inspection record

Care home, 40 beds, Leeds

Rated Good in May 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Simon Marks Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Corinthian House Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    SENSE - 1 Ashley Green Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Rievaulx House Care Centre Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Green Lane Care Centre Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Paisley Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Beeston

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 May 2025 (assessment visit 2 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 9 April 2025 when we first visited the location site. We conducted a further site visit on 16 April 2025 the medicines inspector visited on 10 April 2025 and assessment activity concluded on 22 April 2025. This service is a residential care home for older people, some who may be living with dementia. At the time of our assessment, 37 people lived at Simon Marks Court. 

The home had a well maintained and tastefully decorated environment and grounds that were used by people, their friends, and relatives. There was a positive culture and atmosphere at the home and visitors were welcomed with no restrictions. Staff were kind and caring and keen to promote people’s independence. People’s food and fluid needs were met and people told us they enjoyed the food. Care plans were person centred, and medicines administered safely. Risk assessments were in place and regularly reviewed.

  • Safe Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary


Staff recruitment processes meant staff were suitable for their roles and supported people safely. Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding processes and respected people’s wishes. Where people were unable to make their own decisions, they were supported in-line with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The management team were knowledgeable and understood the responsibilities of their roles. They had quality assurance systems in place to ensure oversight of the service.

Staffing numbers ensured people’s physical and emotional needs were being fully met. The manager had implemented a manual spot check to gain some oversight into call bell waiting times. However, call bell audits were not being undertaken prior to our first visit, due to the system not having this facility, this was rectified by our second visit and an audit had been undertaken this evidenced that most call bells were answered in a timely manner. this meant that it was difficult to assess if call were being answered in a timely manner, feedback from people living at the home and relatives confirmed that staff usually attend promptly.

The service was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment and the service was no longer in breach of these regulations.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment we looked at 1 quality statement and the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  3. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive - this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment we looked at 1 quality statement and the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  4. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Samantha Barclay
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 21 February 2020. Latest assessment published 13 May 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Anchor Hanover GroupBrand: Anchor
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
RS007843 (opens Companies House)

Anchor Hanover Group runs 131 services in England, 32 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 111 are rated Good or Outstanding, 18 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Anchor Hanover Group

  1. O
    Beech Hall Outstanding. Care home, Leeds
  2. O
    St Anne's - Saltash Outstanding. Care home, Cornwall, South West
  3. O
    West Hall Outstanding. Care home, Surrey, South East
  4. G
    Anchor Integrated Care & Housing Village - Denham Garden Village Good. Home care, Buckinghamshire, South East

See all 131 services run by Anchor Hanover Group

Getting help from Leeds City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Simon Marks Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Simon Marks Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Simon Marks Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Simon Marks Court.
When was Simon Marks Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Simon Marks Court was published on 13 May 2025.
Who runs Simon Marks Court?
Simon Marks Court is run by Anchor Hanover Group. It runs 131 services in England, 32 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Simon Marks Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 May 2025.

Contact

Address
Lynwood Garth, Lynwood View, Leeds, LS12 4BE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Corinthian House Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    SENSE - 1 Ashley Green Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Rievaulx House Care Centre Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Green Lane Care Centre Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Paisley Lodge Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

See all care homes in Beeston