Rated Care Homes

Horton Cross Nursing Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 151 of 181

    rated care homes in Somerset are rated Good, like this one.

Horton Cross Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 47 beds, Somerset

Rated Good in February 2026, up from Inadequate.

Horton Cross Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hazelwell Lodge Good, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Vaughan Lee House Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
    Eleighwater House Good, 2.8 miles away
  4. G
    Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home Good, 3.2 miles away
  5. –
    Gillingham Grange Not yet rated, 3.5 miles away

See all care homes in Somerset

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 February 2026 (assessment visit 17 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out a comprehensive assessment of Horton Cross Nursing Home between 5 January and 19 January 2026. We visited the home on 7 January and 13 January 2026. This was a planned assessment where we followed up on a previous breach of legal regulation in relation to governance and to check sustained improvements since the last rating of requires improvement. This assessment found improvements had been made, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service provides nursing care for up to 47 people, including older adults and people living with dementia. At the time of our visit, the service supported 34 people.

Since the last assessment, the provider and the new registered manager have made significant improvements across all five key questions, embedding a culture of safety, strong leadership, and person-centred care. The registered manager had a clear vision for improvement and was praised by staff and relatives for creating a positive culture. Governance systems were embedded, with regular audits and action plans. Staff felt supported and confident to raise concerns. The provider maintained oversight through quality audits, and there was strong engagement with people and families via meetings, newsletters, and surveys.

The provider remains committed to continuous improvement and sustainability. Clinical governance was robust, with regular audits and strong multidisciplinary working.

Staff training compliance was high, and staff were well supported.

The environment had been extensively refurbished, creating a welcoming and homely atmosphere. Bedrooms and communal areas have been redecorated, new flooring installed, and safety measures such as keypad access and door alarms introduced. Gardens have been revitalised, and communal spaces now include a café-style refreshment area for people and visitors.

Medicines were managed safely, with robust systems for ordering, administration, and monitoring. Medicines requiring additional security were audited weekly, and covert medicine decisions were made in line with best interest principles.

Infection prevention and control measures were effective, and staff had completed relevant training. Individual risk assessments were reviewed regularly, and actions were taken promptly to reduce risks, such as purchasing additional pressure-relieving mattresses and introducing clear guidance for mattress settings. Fire safety arrangements were in place, with practical drills and personal emergency evacuation plans in place.

People’s nutritional needs were met, and improvements to the dining experience were evident between the first and second day of the assessment. Staff supported people to make choices and promoted independence, for example by offering finger foods.

People and relatives consistently praised staff for their kindness and compassion. We observed positive interactions and a culture that promoted dignity and respect. End-of-life care was handled sensitively, with staff forming a guard of honour when a person passed away, a practice valued by families.

Care plans were person-centred and regularly reviewed. The service used a “resident of the day” approach to ensure holistic reviews of their care and environment. Activities were varied and meaningful in the communal area, supported by an activity coordinator and volunteers. Life story work was underway to further personalise care. This would ensure people who stayed in their rooms received personalised social support.

Complaints were managed appropriately, though records could be clearer about how outcomes were communicated.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment the provider was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. At this assessment we found improvements had been made, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Elena-Luminita Porancea
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 13 January 2024. Latest assessment published 12 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04928318 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Horton Cross Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Horton Cross Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Horton Cross Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 47 beds at Horton Cross Nursing Home.
When was Horton Cross Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Horton Cross Nursing Home was published on 12 February 2026.
Who runs Horton Cross Nursing Home?
Horton Cross Nursing Home is run by Sentimental Care Limited.
What is Horton Cross Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
0146052144
Address
Horton Cross, Ilminster, TA19 9PT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hazelwell Lodge Good, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Vaughan Lee House Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
    Eleighwater House Good, 2.8 miles away
  4. G
    Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home Good, 3.2 miles away
  5. –
    Gillingham Grange Not yet rated, 3.5 miles away

See all care homes in Somerset