Rated Care Homes

Cedar Lodge Nursing Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 54 of 245

    rated care homes in Birmingham are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Cedar Lodge Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 36 beds, Birmingham

Rated Requires improvement in February 2026, down from Good.

Cedar Lodge Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Oakwood Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Lime Court (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Oakwood Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Lime Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Beech House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    CareTech Community Services Limited - 19 Wheelwright Road Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Loretta House Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Erdington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 February 2026 (assessment visit 14 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Cedar Lodge is a care home with nursing for up to 36 people. The service is registered to provide support to older people, people living with dementia, People with a physical disability or sensory impairment. It is also registered to provide care to people living with a learning disability.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises, and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. At the time of our inspection 26 people were living at the service who were in receipt of a regulated activity.

The inspection included an unannounced visit to the service which took place on 4 December 2025 and an announced visits on 5 and 10 December 2025.

The inspection was prompted in part by concerns raised by Commissioners from the ICB [Integrated Care Board] and the Local Authority following their own visits to the service. We noted during the assessment the provider had taken on board the feedback from the Commissioners and an action plan was in place to address the concerns raised.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

People were supported by a group of staff who knew them well. Staff were aware of the risks to people, what was important to them and how to support them safely. However, support plans and risks assessments in place were not consistently robust and, in some cases, clinical care plans were missing. The environment was tired and required updating and the provider’s own audits had failed to recognise a number of areas of concern that were identified during the assessment.

The provider and new acting manager were responsive to all feedback during the assessment and took immediate action to address the concerns raised. An action plan was in place and work was underway to review all care plans and risk assessments to ensure they provided staff with up to date and accurate information regarding people’s care needs. Arrangements were now in place for staff to receive regular supervision to provide them with the opportunity to discuss their role, their learning and any concerns they may have.

People, relatives, visitors and staff all spoke positively of the recent changes that had taken place at the service. Staff felt supported and welcomed the additional training that had been introduced following the assessment. The provider conceded the management team had ‘taken their eye off the ball’ when it came to governance of the service and responded immediately to the concerns raised.

People and their loved ones spoke highly of the service and shared many examples of how people’s health care needs were met by caring and respectful staff.

We found 1 breach of legal regulation relating to the systems in place to ensure the service is run and managed safely and effectively.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 26 February 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 26 February 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 26 February 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 13 November 2019. Latest assessment published 26 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04134536 (opens Companies House)

United Care limited runs 2 services, all in the West Midlands. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by United Care limited

  1. G
    The Rubens Good. Care home, Telford and Wrekin

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cedar Lodge Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Cedar Lodge Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Cedar Lodge Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Cedar Lodge Nursing Home.
When was Cedar Lodge Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cedar Lodge Nursing Home was published on 26 February 2026.
Who runs Cedar Lodge Nursing Home?
Cedar Lodge Nursing Home is run by United Care limited. It runs 2 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Cedar Lodge Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 26 February 2026.

Contact

Address
58-62 Kingsbury Road, Erdington, Birmingham, B24 8QU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Oakwood Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Lime Court (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Oakwood Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Lime Court Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Beech House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    CareTech Community Services Limited - 19 Wheelwright Road Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Loretta House Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Erdington