Rated Care Homes

Beech House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 23 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 184 of 245

    rated care homes in Birmingham are rated Good, like this one.

Beech House: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Birmingham

Rated Good in November 2024, up from Requires improvement.

Beech House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Loretta House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Oakwood Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Tudor Gardens Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Cedar Lodge Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    CareTech Community Services Limited - 19 Wheelwright Road Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Erdington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 November 2024 (assessment visit 15 October 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 22 October 2024. Beech House is a specialist residential care home that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of this assessment 6 people were living at Beech House. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. People felt safe to raise concerns as the provider had a good, open and transparent learning culture. People were protected from the risks of abuse by staff who understood and managed risks. The home was clean and tidy. People were supported by enough staff with the right skills and experience. People’s medicines were managed safely. People were involved in assessments of their needs. These assessments took account of their communication styles, preferences and aspirations. People understood their care and treatment and this enabled them to give informed consent. Where a person was not able to consent, staff involved those important to people to make decisions in their best interests. People were treated with kindness by staff who protected their dignity. People were treated as individuals by staff who knew their personal preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff members’ wellbeing was supported by the provider and they had regular supervision sessions and ongoing access to training. People and relatives knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. Staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening and learning. The management team were approachable. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Julie Morrissey
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 27 November 2019. Latest assessment published 20 November 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP21410R (opens Companies House)

New Outlook Housing Association Limited runs 5 services, all in the West Midlands. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by New Outlook Housing Association Limited

  1. G
    Boldmere Drive Good. Care home, Birmingham
  2. G
    Home Heroes Good. Home care, Birmingham
  3. RI
    Silver Birch Requires improvement. Care home, Birmingham
  4. RI
    Tulip Gardens Requires improvement. Care home, Birmingham

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Beech House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Beech House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Beech House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Beech House.
When was Beech House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Beech House was published on 20 November 2024.
Who runs Beech House?
Beech House is run by New Outlook Housing Association Limited. It runs 5 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Beech House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 November 2024.

Contact

Address
21 Gravelly Hill North, Erdington, Birmingham, B23 6BT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Loretta House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Oakwood Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Tudor Gardens Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. RI
    Cedar Lodge Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    CareTech Community Services Limited - 19 Wheelwright Road Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Erdington