Rated Care Homes

Compassionate Lodge

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 48 of 231

    rated care homes in Staffordshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Compassionate Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Staffordshire

Rated Requires improvement in August 2026.

Compassionate Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Blythe Bridge (Good, 1.4 miles away) and Ashview House Residential Care Home (Good, 1.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Heathfield House Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Blythe Bridge Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Allan House Good, 1.7 miles away
  5. RI
    Glyn House Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire

See all care homes in Blythe Bridge

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 August 2026 (assessment visit 12 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 15 June to 14 July 2026. Compassionate Lodge is a care home providing residential care to adults of all ages including, people who misuse drugs and alcohol, people with an eating disorder, autistic people or people with learning disabilities, people with mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The inspection was undertaken to provide the service with its first rating.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The provider did not always identify and manage environmental risks effectively, which placed people at risk of harm and lessons had not always been learned from past incidents. There were enough trained staff to meet people's needs. Medicines were managed safely. People, relatives, staff and professionals all spoke positively about the service's approach to raising concerns and keeping people safe.

People's needs were regularly assessed and reviewed and care was person-centred. Staff understood people's needs and were kept up to date on any changes. The provider worked collaboratively with others. Staff supported people holistically, respecting their choices. Mental capacity assessments were completed when required.

People had detailed, individualised care plans and staff understood people well. Staff promoted people’s independence and encouraged them to participate in meaningful activities.

People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff worked effectively with people, relatives and professionals to deliver coordinated, responsive care. Feedback was encouraged, and people’s preferences and future wishes were respected, promoting choice, continuity and positive outcomes.

Governance and oversight systems were not always effective in identifying and addressing environmental safety risks or ensuring learning from incidents was fully embedded. While the provider took prompt action when concerns were highlighted, improvements were needed to strengthen quality assurance processes and ensure risks were consistently identified, managed and learned from. Management was approachable and promoted a positive, inclusive and person-centred culture. Staff, people and relatives felt listened to and valued.

We have found breaches of regulation at the service relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and / or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to premises safety. These failings placed people at risk of harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the overall governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 10 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 10 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sabina Zembe
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09463267 (opens Companies House)

Compassionate Healthcare Limited runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the West Midlands. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Compassionate Healthcare Limited

  1. G
    Compassionate Healthcare Limited aka Scope House Good. Home care, Cheshire East, North West
  2. G
    Compassionate House Good. Care home, Stoke-on-Trent

Getting help from Staffordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Compassionate Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Compassionate Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Compassionate Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Compassionate Lodge.
When was Compassionate Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Compassionate Lodge was published on 10 August 2026.
Who runs Compassionate Lodge?
Compassionate Lodge is run by Compassionate Healthcare Limited. It runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the West Midlands.
What is Compassionate Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 10 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01782 970812
Address
177a, Uttoxeter Road, Draycott, Stoke-on-trent, ST11 9AB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Blythe Bridge (Good, 1.4 miles away) and Ashview House Residential Care Home (Good, 1.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Heathfield House Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
  2. G
    Blythe Bridge Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Allan House Good, 1.7 miles away
  5. RI
    Glyn House Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire

See all care homes in Blythe Bridge