Rated Care Homes

Grove House Residential Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in January 2026.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 23 of 68

    rated care homes in Coventry are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Grove House Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 29 beds, Coventry

Rated Requires improvement in January 2026.

Grove House Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wall Hill Road (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Arden Croft (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Ashfield House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wall Hill Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Arden Croft Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. RI
    Butts Croft House Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    The Spinney Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Coventry

See all care homes in Harvest Hill

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 January 2026 (assessment visit 4 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 4 November to 18 November 2025. Grove House Residential Care Home is a care home providing accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care. It is registered to provide care for up to 29 older people. This inspection was completed to check compliance with the conditions placed on the provider’s registration at the last inspection. We found overall the issues raised at the last inspection had been addressed. This included the significant risks identified in relation to the fire risk assessment and the management of the risk associated with Legionella. Processes to support safe medicines practices had also significantly improved.

  • Safe No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Whilst we found action had been taken to address issues of concern, there remained some areas needing further improvement. We therefore found the provider continued to be in breach of 2 legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, and good governance. The provider had introduced a range of quality assurance tools, but these were still to be fully embedded. Some records continued to lack information and improvements to the environment were ongoing. Where accidents and incidents took place, managers reviewed them to identify trends and any learning from them.

During the inspection we spoke with people who lived at the service, relatives, staff, and the managers of the service. We observed interactions between people and staff. On the day of our visit, there were sufficient levels of care staff to support people’s day to day needs. People were offered choices of food and drink. Arrangements were in place for cleaning of the home on a daily basis but there were some areas in relation to infection prevention and control that needed improvement.

Staff completed training relevant to their roles to keep their skills and practice updated.

The provider had a management consultant working with them to help make and sustain improvements to the service. Managers worked with external teams to ensure people received the care they needed. It was evident the management team were committed to further ongoing improvements. Areas we had identified needing immediate attention on the day of our visit were completed on the same day.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service continues to be in breach of the legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.

  2. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service continues to be in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 6 January 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 6 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Carol Whelan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 10 February 2023. Latest assessment published 6 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02905537 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Coventry City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Grove House Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Grove House Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Grove House Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 29 beds at Grove House Residential Care Home.
When was Grove House Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Grove House Residential Care Home was published on 6 January 2026.
Who runs Grove House Residential Care Home?
Grove House Residential Care Home is run by Ratan Care Homes Limited.
What is Grove House Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 6 January 2026.

Contact

Address
215 Tamworth Road, Keresley, Coventry, CV7 8JJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Wall Hill Road (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Arden Croft (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Ashfield House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Wall Hill Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Arden Croft Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. RI
    Butts Croft House Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  5. G
    The Spinney Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Coventry

See all care homes in Harvest Hill