Rated Care Homes

SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.

  • 2 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 214 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, East Sussex

Rated Good in May 2024.

SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Seaford Head Retirement Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Cornfield House Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Westerleigh Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Port Manor Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Seaford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 May 2024 (assessment visit 16 January 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. 'Right support, right care, right culture' is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 5 people. The service supports people with learning disabilities and autism. At the time of our assessment there were 4 people using the service. We carried out this assessment between 14 February 2024 and 11 March 2024. We looked at how the service assessed and planned for people's care needs, and how they trained and supervised staff to support people according to their needs and preferences. We spoke with 1 person, 1 relative and 6 staff. We observed care and support in communal areas and reviewed 2 people’s care plans, 3 staff recruitment records as well as general records for the service. These included staff training records, meeting records, policies and procedures and audits. We assessed the following quality statements: safeguarding, involving people to manage risk, safe and effective staffing, medicines optimisation, assessing needs, monitoring and improving outcomes, consent to care and treatment, independence, choice and control, equity in experience and outcomes and governance, management and sustainability.

  1. Safe

    Good

    People lived safely and were protected from avoidable harm. Staff and leaders were able to identify situations that amounted to safeguarding and staff were confident to use the whistleblowing process if needed. Risks were managed well. Some risk assessment reviews were overdue but this was being addressed by the managers and there was no risk to people. Staff knew people well and were able to identify changes in behaviours and presentation that meant that people were feeling anxious, upset or concerned about something. Risk assessments provided detail of triggers and steps to take to support people when required. Lessons were learned when things went wrong, an example of this was the overhaul of the process for administering and recording medicines. Medicines were administered and recorded safely and in line with service policies. Staff were recruited safely and were supported through a robust induction process and with ongoing supervision and appraisal meetings. There were enough staff to support people safely. Ongoing training made sure that staff had the skills needed to support people.

  2. Effective

    Good

    People had the best possible outcomes because their needs were assessed, staff understood their support needs. Their care, support and treatment reflected these needs and any protected equality characteristics. The service worked in harmony with people at the centre of their care. People were enabled and encouraged to make their own choices. People were supported to live independently. People were supported within the service and within the community to achieve their goals and aspirations.

  3. Caring

    Good

    People were treated with kindness, empathy and compassion. Their privacy and dignity was respected. Every effort was made to take their wishes into account and respect their choices, to achieve the best possible outcomes for them. This included supporting people to live as independently as possible and to maintain important relationships.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    People were able to access care in ways that met their personal circumstances and protected equality characteristics, when they needed it. People’s preferences and choices were respected. People's communication needs were known and understood by staff.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    There was an inclusive and positive culture of continuous learning and improvement. This was based on meeting the needs of people who use services. Leaders proactively supported staff and collaborated with partners to deliver care that was safe and person-centred. There were effective governance and management systems in place. Information about risks, performance and outcomes was used effectively to improve care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Caroline Pulleyn
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 5 February 2020. Latest assessment published 13 May 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
The Royal School for the BlindBrand: SeeAbility
Ownership type
Organisation
Charity number
255913

The Royal School for the Blind runs 20 services in England, 17 of them in the South East. 12 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 7 have no rating yet.

Other services run by The Royal School for the Blind

  1. G
    SeeAbility - Barclay House Residential Home Good. Care home, East Sussex
  2. G
    SeeAbility - Denecroft Residential Home Good. Care home, Surrey
  3. G
    SeeAbility - Devon Support Service Good. Home care, Devon, South West
  4. G
    SeeAbility - Fiennes House Residential Home Good. Care home, Somerset, South West

See all 20 services run by The Royal School for the Blind

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home.
When was SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home was published on 13 May 2024.
Who runs SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home?
SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home is run by The Royal School for the Blind. It runs 20 services in England, 17 of them in the South East.
What is SeeAbility - Applewood Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 May 2024.

Contact

Phone
01323 873270
Address
Applewood, 37 Headland Avenue, Seaford, BN25 4PZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Seaford Head Retirement Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Cornfield House Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Westerleigh Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Port Manor Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

See all care homes in Seaford