Rated Care Homes

Christ the King, Footherley Hall

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in August 2025.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 48 of 231

    rated care homes in Staffordshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Christ the King, Footherley Hall: inspection record

Care home, 50 beds, Staffordshire

Rated Requires improvement in August 2025.

Christ the King, Footherley Hall: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Shenstone Hall (Good, 1 mile away) and Watford House Residential Home (Good, 1.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Shenstone Hall Good, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Watford House Residential Home Good, 1.7 miles away
  3. RI
    Aston Court Care Home Requires improvement, 2.2 miles away
  4. G
    Castlehill Specialist Care Centre Good, 2.3 miles away
  5. –
    Shelbourne Specialist Care Centre Not yet rated, 2.3 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 August 2025 (assessment visit 16 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Christ the King- Footherley Care Home is a care home providing support to people over the age of 65 who may be living with a dementia, a physical disability and or a sensory impairment. The inspection took place on Monday 23 and Wednesday 25 June 2025. The inspection was undertaken to follow up on the previous inspection in October 2024.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Following our last inspection, we asked the provider to provide us with an action plan to demonstrate how improvements would be made in relation to the management of people’s risks, the safe management of medicines, and the governance of the service. During this inspection we found continued breaches of regulation relating to risk and medicine management, the governance of the service and a new breach of regulation relating to the assessment of people’s mental capacity. The registered manager had not always submitted to us notifications about key events at the service. This was a breach of a registration regulation.

The systems in place were not always effective in monitoring and managing people’s risks. The care records were not always completed appropriately, which meant staff and management were not always aware of important information about people’s needs. Medicines were not always recorded in a safe way. The systems in place to assess and manage the quality and safety of the service were not always effective.

Staff understood the importance of consent and empowered people to be involved in their own care and to make their own decisions where possible, but where people lacked mental capacity, they did not have the necessary mental capacity assessments in place.

Staff knew how to recognise concerns, and worked well as a team, however, there needed to be more clear, robust processes in place to ensure safeguarding concerns were referred to external agencies where needed and there was an ongoing culture of learning and accountability.

Staff were caring and kind and supported people in a dignified way.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, risk management and medicine management.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent.

  3. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 20 August 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 20 August 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 20 August 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Claire Zehe
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 11 November 2023. Latest assessment published 20 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Charity number
1198657

Sisters Hospitallers of the Sacred Heart of Jesus CIO runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Sisters Hospitallers of the Sacred Heart of Jesus CIO

  1. G
    St Teresa's Care Home Good. Care home, Kensington and Chelsea, London
  2. RI
    St Augustine's Care Home Requires improvement. Care home, Surrey, South East

Getting help from Staffordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Christ the King, Footherley Hall provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Christ the King, Footherley Hall as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Christ the King, Footherley Hall have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 50 beds at Christ the King, Footherley Hall.
When was Christ the King, Footherley Hall last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Christ the King, Footherley Hall was published on 20 August 2025.
Who runs Christ the King, Footherley Hall?
Christ the King, Footherley Hall is run by Sisters Hospitallers of the Sacred Heart of Jesus CIO. It runs 3 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands.
What is Christ the King, Footherley Hall's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 20 August 2025.

Contact

Phone
01543 480253
Address
Footherley Lane, Shenstone, Lichfield, WS14 0HG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Shenstone Hall (Good, 1 mile away) and Watford House Residential Home (Good, 1.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Shenstone Hall Good, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Watford House Residential Home Good, 1.7 miles away
  3. RI
    Aston Court Care Home Requires improvement, 2.2 miles away
  4. G
    Castlehill Specialist Care Centre Good, 2.3 miles away
  5. –
    Shelbourne Specialist Care Centre Not yet rated, 2.3 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire