Laurieston House
- Care home
- 5 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2010
- Chesterfield, Derbyshire, East Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
165 of 219
rated care homes in Derbyshire are rated Good, like this one.
Laurieston House: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- RI Ashcroft Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- RI Bank Close House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- G Brookholme Croft Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Riverdale Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Amberley Nursing Home Good, 0.9 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 July 2026 (assessment visit 15 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 18 June 2026 to 25 June 2026
Laurieston House is a residential care home for 5 people with learning disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 5 people living there.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
The service had been rated as good at their previous inspection (report published 2 July 2018), and we carried out this inspection because it was an aged rating. This inspection was carried out by one inspector and was unannounced.
At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good.
The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Incidents had rarely happened, but when they did the registered manager investigated them thoroughly. Staff understood and managed risks well. There were enough staff with the right skills, knowledge, and experience. Staff received regular and relevant training. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Staff managed people’s prescribed medicines well.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People decided how they individually received care. People’s person-centred care plans and risk assessments took account of their individual communication needs as well as their personal care and health needs. Staff monitored people’s health to encourage healthy living and made sure people always had enough to eat and drink. People made their own decisions about the care they received, and the provider’s staff enabled people to maintain control over how they wanted to live their own life.
The registered manager and staff had a shared vision and culture based on enabling people to make their own choices about how they wanted to live their lives.
The registered manager was knowledgeable about the individual care needs of the people living at the care home and was supportive towards the care staff, helping them to develop in their roles. They treated staff fairly and respected their wellbeing. The registered manager collaborated with the community healthcare teams to ensure people received consistent and effective healthcare support. There was a culture of enabling people to live ordinary lives in the community with just the level of support needed to keep people safe from harm.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery. -
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Shane Hughes
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)4 inspection reports, latest 29 June 2018. Latest assessment published 16 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Laurieston House
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Getting help from Derbyshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Derbyshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01629 533190, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Derbyshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Laurieston House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Laurieston House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Laurieston House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Laurieston House.
- When was Laurieston House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Laurieston House was published on 16 July 2026.
- Who runs Laurieston House?
- Laurieston House is run by Laurieston House.
- What is Laurieston House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 July 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01246 238213
- Address
- 118 Hady Hill, Hady, Chesterfield, S41 0EF Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- RI Ashcroft Care Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- RI Bank Close House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- G Brookholme Croft Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Riverdale Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Amberley Nursing Home Good, 0.9 miles away