Rated Care Homes

Shangri-La Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in October 2026.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 336 of 420

    rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Good, like this one.

Shangri-La Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 25 beds, Hampshire

Rated Good in October 2026.

Shangri-La Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Canford Manor Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    The Warren Residential Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    78 Stubbington Lane Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. RI
    Solent Lodge Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  5. RI
    Newgate Lane Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Peel Common

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 October 2026 (assessment visit 16 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 29 April to 7 May 2026. Shangri-La provides accommodation and personal care for up to 25 older people, some of whom live with dementia. Accommodation is arranged over two floors with stair and lift access. At the time of our inspection 18 people lived at the home. This inspection was conducted to follow up on previously issued warning notices and action plan requirements from the last inspection. The service had made improvements and is no longer in breach of regulations.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found improvements in processes for assessing mental capacity and consent, records of care and medicines, monitoring of risks related to the environment, safeguarding systems, monitoring of staff training and competencies, and how organisational learning was shared and embedded within the service.

The new home manager promoted a positive learning culture and people could raise concerns.

Staff received training in safeguarding and managers understood when to make safeguarding referrals. Feedback from external professionals confirmed the provider continued to work with them and had an action plan to monitor and share safeguarding concerns.

There were enough staff deployed to meet people’s needs. Staff received training and this was monitored to ensure it was up to date.

There were effective processes to prevent and control infection. Regular audits were carried out to oversee the cleanliness and safety of the environment.

People’s medicines were managed safely by trained staff who received regular competency checks.

People’s needs were assessed prior to moving to the service. People’s care plans contained risk assessments and guidance for staff on how to manage risks associated with people’s care and support. These records were mostly accurate and up to date. Some further work was ongoing to embed the new recording systems.

Staff gained people's consent prior to providing care and support. Care plans provided staff with guidance about how to involve people as fully as possible in making decisions.

Staff were well supported and spoke positively about the leadership and management of the home. The provider valued diversity in their workforce and promoted an inclusive and fair culture.

The management team worked closely and effectively together and demonstrated a clear understanding of their roles, and a commitment to improving the lives of people. There was a focus on continuous learning, innovation and improvement.

There were systems and procedures for monitoring the quality and safety of the service. A range of audits and monitoring tools had been introduced to increase management oversight and quality assurance.

Feedback we received from health professionals included, “The staff I have interacted with have appeared caring and respectful towards residents. They are usually familiar with residents’ medical backgrounds” and “Overall, my experience of working with Shangri-La Residential Home has been positive, and I feel residents generally receive appropriate support with their health and wellbeing.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good: This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    At our last inspection the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, medicines management, safeguarding and contemporaneous record keeping.

    At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of the regulations.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good: This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

    At our last inspection the provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to Need for consent. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  3. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good: This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    At our last inspection the provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and theproviderwas no longer in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 1 December 2017. Latest assessment published 20 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07105940 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Shangri-La Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Shangri-La Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Shangri-La Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 25 beds at Shangri-La Residential Home.
When was Shangri-La Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Shangri-La Residential Home was published on 20 October 2026.
Who runs Shangri-La Residential Home?
Shangri-La Residential Home is run by Shangri-La Care Services Limited.
What is Shangri-La Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 October 2026.

Contact

Address
17 Milvil Road, Lee On The Solent, PO13 9LU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Canford Manor Nursing Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    The Warren Residential Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    78 Stubbington Lane Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. RI
    Solent Lodge Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  5. RI
    Newgate Lane Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Peel Common