Blackberry Hill
- Care home
- 10 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2014
- Castle Cary, Somerset, South West
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
6 months
since the latest rating was published.
21 of 181
rated care homes in Somerset are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Blackberry Hill: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in April 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Dimensions Somerset The Maples (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Highfield House Residential Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Dimensions Somerset The Maples Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Highfield House Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- – Weavers Lodge Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
- G Cary Brook Good, 0.3 miles away
- G South Cary House Good, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 9 April 2026 (assessment visit 16 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 22nd January – 10th February 2026.
Blackberry Hill is a residential care home providing support to 10 younger adults. The service supports autistic people and people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service using ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People’s rights under the Mental Capacity Act were not fully upheld. Where people lacked the capacity to consent, the provider did not always work in accordance with the law and current best practice guidelines.
People lived in a home where regular checks were not always completed to ensure the safety of the environment. During the inspection we also identified concerns relating to fire safety and staffing that placed people at risk. Significant findings identified during a fire risk assessment had not all been actioned. The provider gave assurances during the assessment that action was being taken to address the shortfalls. We also raised these concerns with the local fire service.
People had their needs assessed when they moved to the home. Care plans were developed using these assessments. Improvements were needed to ensure care plans and risk assessments reflected people’s current needs.
Governance arrangements were not effective and did not ensure risks were consistently identified or addressed. A series of checks and audits were completed, but these had not been effective in monitoring quality or driving improvement. The registered manager was responsive to feedback. Some improvements had been completed before the end of the assessment.
We found a breach of regulations concerning governance. The provider took some immediate action during the inspection, but governance systems were not robust enough to provide ongoing assurance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to some of the concerns found at this assessment.
Medicines were managed well and staff worked with agencies involved in people’s care. Staff felt supported and were treated equally.
Staff worked well with health professionals, ensured timely access to healthcare, and supported people to lead active, fulfilling lives.
People experienced caring and compassionate support, and staff promoted choice, communication and meaningful activity. People were treated with dignity and respect, and relatives consistently reported that their family members had a good quality of life.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well‑led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high‑quality, person‑centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care. The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 9 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 9 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Catharine Rees
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)3 inspection reports, latest 17 February 2021. Latest assessment published 9 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Voyage 1 LimitedBrand: Voyage
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 02215899 (opens Companies House)
Voyage 1 Limited runs 278 services in England, 41 of them in the South West. 239 are rated Good or Outstanding, 24 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 15 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Voyage 1 Limited
- O 1 Sheringham Avenue Outstanding. Care home, Enfield, London
- O 23 Cecil Road Outstanding. Care home, Derbyshire, East Midlands
- O 4 Pages Orchard Outstanding. Care home, Oxfordshire, South East
- O Bewick House Outstanding. Care home, Darlington, North East
Getting help from Somerset Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Somerset Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 123 2224, Monday to Friday, 8.30am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Somerset Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Blackberry Hill provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Blackberry Hill as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Blackberry Hill have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at Blackberry Hill.
- When was Blackberry Hill last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Blackberry Hill was published on 9 April 2026.
- Who runs Blackberry Hill?
- Blackberry Hill is run by Voyage 1 Limited. It runs 278 services in England, 41 of them in the South West.
- What is Blackberry Hill's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 9 April 2026.
Contact
- Address
- Ansford Road, Castle Cary, BA7 7HG Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Dimensions Somerset The Maples (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Highfield House Residential Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Dimensions Somerset The Maples Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Highfield House Residential Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- – Weavers Lodge Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
- G Cary Brook Good, 0.3 miles away
- G South Cary House Good, 0.5 miles away