Rated Care Homes

Warwick House

Care home, Croydon, 6 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Warwick House: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Croydon

Rated Good in March 2018.

Warwick House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 2 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016 and March 2018.

It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2016. The latest rating was published about 9 years ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 99 Good care homes in Croydon, out of 112 with a rating.
  • Smaller than 9 in 10 care homes in Croydon.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 20 March 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Warwick House is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement.

Warwick House does not provide nursing care. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The service supports up to six people with complex mental health conditions, some of whom also had a history of substance abuse. The service provides two year rehabilitation programmes to people to support them to move on to live more independently. There were six people using the service at the time of our inspection.

Read the full summary

When we last visited the home on 16 December 2015 and13 January 2016 the service was meeting the regulations we looked at and was rated Good overall. At this inspection we found the service remained Good overall and also for each key question.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were protected from abuse and improper treatment as staff understood their responsibilities to safeguard people. The provider trained staff in safeguarding each year.

The provider reduced risks relating to people's care through suitable risk assessment processes. This included risks relating to people's mental health conditions and substance misuse. People's medicines were managed safely.

Staff were recruited through appropriate recruitment processes to check they were suitable to work with people. There were sufficient numbers of staff deployed to support people.

The premises were maintained safely although some window restrictors had been removed during the on- going renovation work. This meant people were at risk from falling from height and the registered manager told us they would reinstall restrictors promptly. The premises met people's support needs and people had access to all communal areas.

We found the service was clean and infection control processes were in place. However, the registered manager agreed to make infection control audits more comprehensive and robust.

Staff were supported to understand their role and people's needs through induction, training, supervision and annual appraisal.

People were received coordinated care when moving into the service. People's care needs were assessed though consultation with people and the professionals involved in people's care.

The registered manager and staff had a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 as they received training in this. People were positive about the food they received and food was provided according to people's choices. People were supported with their day to day health needs and to access professionals they needed to maintain their mental and physical health.

Staff knew the people they supported and were respectful towards people. Staff also respected people's privacy.

People were supported to maintain and build their independent living skills and people shared a goal to live more independently after their two year programme ended. People were encouraged to seek work experience, paid employment or training.

People were supported to maintain and develop relationships to reduce social isolation.

Staff used people's care plans to provide people with choice in their care in a person-centred way. People's care plans reflected their physical, mental, emotional and social needs, their personal history, individual preferences, interests and aspirations.

People were supported to access activities they were interested in and told us they had enough to occupy themselves in a meaningful way.

The complaints process continued to be suitable although the service had not received any complaints since our last inspection.

The service was led by a competent and experienced registered manager. The registered manager oversaw governance systems to ensure the service ran smoothly and people received good quality care. Records relating to people and the management of the service were accurate and well maintained.

Leadership was visible across the service as a senior rehabilitation officer was on shift at all times. Senior's received training and mentoring in leadership and management to help them develop professionally. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities.

The provider communicated openly with people, staff and professionals. Daily meeting were held each morning for people to share any concerns and regular staff meetings were also held. The provider sent the mental health professionals involved in people's care monthly updates.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  • The last rating is 9 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Warwick House
Address83 Warwick Road, Thornton Heath, CR7 7NN
NeighbourhoodThornton Heath, Croydon
Phone020 8684 0241
Registered managerDanon Kaydoo
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Mental Health
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 2 inspection reports, latest 20 March 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Warwick House
ProviderBasdeo Kaydoo
Ownership typeIndividual

Basdeo Kaydoo runs 2 services in London. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Basdeo Kaydoo

  1. G
    Ambleside Lodge - London Care home, Lambeth
    Good

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Norbury Hall Care home, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    Beulah Lodge Care home, 0.5 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    Beulah Road Care home, 0.5 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    Norcrest Care home, 0.5 miles away
    Good
  5. RI
    Graceland Care home, 0.5 miles away
    Requires improvement

See all care homes in Croydon

Getting help from London Borough of Croydon

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Warwick House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Warwick House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Warwick House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Warwick House.
When was Warwick House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Warwick House was published on 20 March 2018.
Who runs Warwick House?
Warwick House is run by Basdeo Kaydoo. It runs 2 services in London.
What is Warwick House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 March 2018.