Rated Care Homes

Lower St Helens

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 9 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 336 of 420

    rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Good, like this one.

Lower St Helens: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Hampshire

Rated Good in March 2018.

Lower St Helens: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Laurels Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    The Grange Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Bonhomie House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Maypole Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Devon Lodge Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Hedge End

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 8 March 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Lower St Helens is a residential care home providing personal care to up to four people. The service provides support to people who have learning disabilities or autism. At the time of our inspection there were four people using the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found the following examples of good practice. For the duration of the pandemic, no staff or people using the service had a positive COVID-19 test.

The provider had robust entry requirements for visitors to the service. All had to produce either a clear LFD or take one on arrival waiting outside until the results were visible. They had to complete health and contact questionnaires, have their temperature recorded and be fully vaccinated. There was also sanitising hand gel available for use at the entry.

The premises were very clean, there were thorough cleaning schedules completed. Frequently touched areas including door handles, bannisters, taps and toilet flushers were all sanitised three times each day which records evidenced.

People had been accepting of staff wearing face masks and had all been willing to wear then when accessing the community. There had been no issues around communication as a result of wearing face masks. People had been supported to understand why additional infection prevention and control measures such as wearing face masks and cleaning more than usual through use of easy read materials.

Though there had been no cases of COVID-19 in the service, contingency plans were in place to safeguard people should there be an outbreak. At the start of the pandemic, staff ensured there was sufficient social distance within the communal areas of the service, for example, the dining table was measured to ensure adequate distance between people and they were encouraged to use the same seat at the table to minimise cross infection.

A person attended day services twice per week and staff ensured they sanitised their hands and wore a mask when they went. On return, their clothing was laundered, masks disposed of and their bag sanitised to minimise the risk of contaminants.

In the event of an outbreak, staffing could be increased through use of both bank staff and agency staff. If needed, the provider would block book staff to ensure continuity. Staff had been trained in using personal protective equipment, PPE and infection prevention and control (IPC). There were also arrangements for staff to access the premises through the front door and sanitise and add a face masks and then go directly to the laundry where they could don and doff any other necessary PPE.

The provider had supported staff throughout the pandemic. There was a staff held phone line where they

could get advice or services such as counselling and the provider asked staff who were off sick to contact them at intervals in order to stay in touch and updated about their well-being.

To enhance people's well-being during the pandemic, the provider researched and used different therapies including aromatherapy and light therapy. For example, at breakfast time each day, light therapy lamps were used for 15 minutes. Usually used to prevent seasonal affective disorder, this was used to improve mood and wellness usually found from exposure to the sun. Aromatherapy was used to stimulate and relax people.

The provider had ensured ample PPE was available to services. There had been no shortfalls throughout the pandemic and sufficient stock was held should an outbreak happen.

We were assured that this service met good infection prevention and control guidelines.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 9 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Marisa Alexandra De Jesus Goncalves
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 8 March 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Voyage 1 LimitedBrand: Voyage
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02215899 (opens Companies House)

Voyage 1 Limited runs 278 services in England, 76 of them in the South East. 239 are rated Good or Outstanding, 24 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 15 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Voyage 1 Limited

  1. O
    1 Sheringham Avenue Outstanding. Care home, Enfield, London
  2. O
    23 Cecil Road Outstanding. Care home, Derbyshire, East Midlands
  3. O
    4 Pages Orchard Outstanding. Care home, Oxfordshire
  4. O
    Bewick House Outstanding. Care home, Darlington, North East

See all 278 services run by Voyage 1 Limited

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Lower St Helens provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Lower St Helens as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Lower St Helens have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Lower St Helens.
When was Lower St Helens last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lower St Helens was published on 4 March 2018.
Who runs Lower St Helens?
Lower St Helens is run by Voyage 1 Limited. It runs 278 services in England, 76 of them in the South East.
What is Lower St Helens's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 March 2018.

Contact

Phone
01489 787449
Address
30 Lower St Helens Road, Hedge End, Southampton, SO30 0LU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Laurels Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    The Grange Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Bonhomie House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Maypole Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    Devon Lodge Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

See all care homes in Hedge End