Coralyn House
- Care home
- 5 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Hunstanton, Norfolk, East of England
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
This month
The latest rating was published.
173 of 288
rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Good, like this one.
Coralyn House: inspection record
Rated Good in October 2026, up from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- O Nightingale Lodge Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- G Beach View Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Merrimore House Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI Driftwood House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Norfolk Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 October 2026 (assessment visit 20 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 2 September to 30 September 2026. Coralyn House is a residential care home providing accommodation for up to 5 people with learning disabilities and/or autism, who require personal care. At the time of our inspection there were 4 people living at the service. This assessment was to follow up on the action taken following the identified breaches at the previous inspection.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At this inspection we found the provider was meeting these principles.
The provider was introducing a revised governance system. Due to these changes we identified gaps in relation to monitoring, needs assessment and Mental Capacity Act assessments being in place. However, there was a quality assurance action plan to give oversight of work to be completed to ensure areas were not overlooked.
People were supported by a small staff team who had the skills and knowledge to provide effective support. Staff showed a good understanding of the people they supported and consistently promoted their dignity and respect, taking account of their personal needs, preferences and choices.
Staff demonstrated a clear understanding of the safeguarding procedures in place and expressed confidence that any concerns would be appropriately addressed by the management team. They felt supported and valued and worked well as a team.
A staff member told us, “Yes, it is a good place to work and we are like family. We support each other, communicate openly and work as a team to make sure residents receive the best care.”
The service had made improvements and was no longer in breach of regulations. The provider was implementing new governance systems which gave oversight to ensure people were protected from the risk of harm. People’s rights, choices and independence was promoted and care planning information included clear guidance on how to support people to meet their needs.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment at the last inspection. They are no longer in breach of this legal regulation at this inspection.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service at the last inspection. Improvements have been made and they are no longer in breach of this legal regulation.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 13 March 2020. Latest assessment published 7 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Mrs Keshwaree Ramana
- Ownership type
- Individual
Getting help from Norfolk County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Norfolk County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0344 800 8020, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Norfolk County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Coralyn House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Coralyn House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Coralyn House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Coralyn House.
- When was Coralyn House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Coralyn House was published on 7 October 2026.
- Who runs Coralyn House?
- Coralyn House is run by Mrs Keshwaree Ramana.
- What is Coralyn House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 7 October 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01485 535999
- Address
- 12 Glebe Avenue, Hunstanton, PE36 6BS Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- O Nightingale Lodge Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- G Beach View Good, 0.1 miles away
- G Merrimore House Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI Driftwood House Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Norfolk Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away