Rated Care Homes

Harmonia Village

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 89 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Harmonia Village: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 36 beds, Kent

Rated Requires improvement in July 2025.

Harmonia Village: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: White Cliffs Lodge (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Felbrigg House (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Dover House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    White Cliffs Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Twyford House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Felbrigg House Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Dover

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 31 July 2025 (assessment visit 20 January 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: This inspection took place on 18 and 20 February 2025. We found 3 breaches of the regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, cleanliness and good governance. This was the services first inspection and was unannounced.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Harmonia Village provides support to older people many of whom live with dementia. The service is provided across six houses which are arranged on a ‘street’. There is also a main building, the hub, which includes a lounge area and dining area as well as toilet facilities. People spent time in the hub undertaking activities or eating meals.

There were some areas where the service needed to make improvements. For example, ensuring lessons from incidents were shared with all staff and care plans included a sufficient level of detail. Prior to the inspection there were some areas where more staffing was needed. However, this concern was addressed during the inspection. We identified some areas where cleanliness could have been improved.

There were systems in place to provide governance. However, these systems had not always led to the improvements needed and would benefit from review in some areas. The model of care provided was aimed at increasing independence. However, there were times when more flexibility had been needed to support people’s needs.

People were supported to receive their medicine on time. However, there were some areas where medicine management needed to be improved. These concerns were addressed during the inspection.

People were protected from the risk of abuse. The environment was managed safely to ensure risks such as fire safety were managed. People were supported to move into the service safely.

The service worked in partnership with other services to improve outcomes for people. The registered manager was accessible to staff and people. Where people raised concerns, action had been taken, and people and staff were listened to.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this inspection.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Requires Improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the cleanliness of the service.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Requires Improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance and record keeping at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 31 July 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 31 July 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Syam Mohan Mohanan Pillai
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Harmonia Care Village LimitedBrand: The Graham Care Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13979587 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Harmonia Village provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Harmonia Village as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Harmonia Village have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Harmonia Village.
When was Harmonia Village last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Harmonia Village was published on 31 July 2025.
Who runs Harmonia Village?
Harmonia Village is run by Harmonia Care Village Limited.
What is Harmonia Village's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 31 July 2025.

Contact

Address
42 Randolph Road, Dover, CT17 0FZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: White Cliffs Lodge (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Felbrigg House (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Dover House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    White Cliffs Lodge Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Twyford House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Felbrigg House Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Dover