Rated Care Homes

The Hollies

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 186 of 249

    rated care homes in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

The Hollies: inspection record

Care home, 21 beds, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in November 2025, up from Requires improvement.

The Hollies: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Adams House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Fieldings Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    CCT Community Enablement Team LTD, Enablement Care Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. O
    Sutton House Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    Willow Lodge Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Sutton in Ashfield

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 November 2025 (assessment visit 26 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 16 September to 2 October 2025.

The Hollies is a residential care home providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. At the time of our assessment the home was supporting 14 people who were in receipt of the regulated activity of personal care. The care home was set across 6 separate buildings named Clover, Bramble, Willow, Rowan, Maple, Cedar and Graham Kenny apartments.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was prompted as the location had not been assessed since 2019. The provider was also previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to premises and equipment. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, Right Care, Right Culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Right Support:

People were encouraged to lead their lives in their chosen way and took control of decisions about their care. Independence was encouraged and supported. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications, and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervision to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and people had regular health checks and medicine reviews.

Right Care:

People received dignified care that respected their privacy and human rights. Care and support was person-centred. Individualised care and support plans were in place that enabled staff to provide appropriate and safe care for each person. People’s preferred communication styles were known and respected.

Care plans provided information about people’s lives prior to moving into the service, including information as to their work history, family life, hobbies and interests. Care plans reflected people’s care needs, including plans for the future. Potential risks were assessed, with care records providing guidance for staff on how to mitigate risk and support people well. Staff were very kind and caring towards people. Staff knew people well and cared for them in a person-centred way.

Right Culture:

The ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff ensured people using services led confident, inclusive, and empowered lives. Staff were being supported by a positive behaviour support practitioner who worked with them to understand individual’s specific needs.

Leaders were committed to providing a non-discriminatory environment for people using the service and staff. Practices ensured people’s consent to care was obtained for all health and care interventions. Where people lacked capacity to make informed decisions, best interest decisions were made and documented.

The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risk while supporting people to take part in activities in their local community and try new things. The facilities met people’s needs, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. Governance was effective and identifying areas to improve. Regular audits were being completed to monitor quality and safety.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Benjamin Meadley
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

10 inspection reports, latest 18 January 2022. Latest assessment published 17 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Quality Care (EM) LimitedBrand: Choice Care Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04651403 (opens Companies House)

Quality Care (EM) Limited runs 3 services, all in the East Midlands. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Quality Care (EM) Limited

  1. O
    Derwent View Outstanding. Care home, Derby
  2. G
    Adams House Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Hollies provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Hollies as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Hollies have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 21 beds at The Hollies.
When was The Hollies last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Hollies was published on 17 November 2025.
Who runs The Hollies?
The Hollies is run by Quality Care (EM) Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is The Hollies's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 November 2025.

Contact

Phone
01623 512850
Address
20 Alfreton Road, Sutton In Ashfield, NG17 1FW Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Adams House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Fieldings Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    CCT Community Enablement Team LTD, Enablement Care Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  4. O
    Sutton House Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  5. –
    Willow Lodge Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Sutton in Ashfield