Cedar Tree Care Home Limited
- Care home
- 40 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Littleover, Derby, East Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
4 months
since the latest rating was published.
17 of 63
rated care homes in Derby are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Cedar Tree Care Home Limited: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Annefield House Limited (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Littleover Nursing Home (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Annefield House Limited Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Littleover Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- RI Nightingale Care and Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- G Middleton Lodge Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Linden House Good, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 June 2026 (assessment visit 17 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 19 May to 2 June 2026. This service is a care home providing personal and nursing care for older people, some who may be living with dementia, sensory impairment or physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection 37 people lived at Cedar Tree Care Home Limited.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This focused assessment was carried out to follow up on the breaches of regulations found at our last assessment. These related to the processes used to recruit staff, the provision of safe care and treatment, the processes to ensure proper consent was obtained under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and the governance at the service.
We found the provider had made sufficient progress and was no longer in breach of the regulations regarding consent, recruitment and governance. However, whilst some improvements had been made in the regulation for safe care and treatment, we continued to find concerns with the care planning and management of behaviours that could cause harm to people or others. Therefore, this constituted a further breach of regulation for safe care and treatment.
Care plans and risk assessments were now more up to date however, this was not consistent. Improvements were still needed to ensure risks were identified when people could have behaviours that placed themselves or others at risk, and to ensure their care plan provided clear guidance in such situations to ensure people’s care was safe and effective. The policy for managing behaviours that could place people and others at risk needed improvement. Incidents were not used as opportunities to learn and improve people’s care.
Staff had now received recent training in the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Records showed where this had now been applied to people’s care decisions however, this still needed further improvements to be made to ensure mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were recorded in line with the guidance.
Staff had now completed recent training in areas relating to people’s care. All the required pre-employment checks had been completed in line with the requirements for people working in care settings.
Cleaning records had now been completed to a better standard and the carpets downstairs had now been cleaned. Carpets throughout the rest of the home were scheduled to be replaced however, there was no specific timeframes attached to this work. Armchairs and dining chairs remained stained.
Records of people’s care were now more accurate however, details of how staff assisted people to re-position themselves to help prevent pressure damage were not consistently made.
Medicines were now stored in line with good practice.
People enjoyed their meals and people’s weight was monitored to help reduce risks associated with weight loss.
Policies had been revised however, some needed further revisions to ensure they were in line with current guidance.
The provider now had meetings with relatives to hear their views and feedback on their actions. Further work was needed to ensure staff views could also be heard and contribute to the development to the service.
Feedback described the registered manager as helpful and approachable. Feedback continued to be mixed over how successful the provider had been in creating a trusting and open culture at the service.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Thelma Dempsey
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)9 inspection reports, latest 24 February 2021. Latest assessment published 25 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Cedar Tree Care Home Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 06392588 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Derby City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Derby City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01332 640777, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Derby City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Cedar Tree Care Home Limited provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Cedar Tree Care Home Limited as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Cedar Tree Care Home Limited have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Cedar Tree Care Home Limited.
- When was Cedar Tree Care Home Limited last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cedar Tree Care Home Limited was published on 25 June 2026.
- Who runs Cedar Tree Care Home Limited?
- Cedar Tree Care Home Limited is run by Cedar Tree Care Home Ltd.
- What is Cedar Tree Care Home Limited's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 June 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01332 767485
- Address
- Rowley Lane, Littleover, Derby, DE23 1FT Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Annefield House Limited (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Littleover Nursing Home (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Annefield House Limited Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Littleover Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- RI Nightingale Care and Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- G Middleton Lodge Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Linden House Good, 0.7 miles away