Rated Care Homes

Cedar Tree Care Home Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 17 of 63

    rated care homes in Derby are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Cedar Tree Care Home Limited: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 40 beds, Derby

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.

Cedar Tree Care Home Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Annefield House Limited (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Littleover Nursing Home (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Annefield House Limited Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    Littleover Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. RI
    Nightingale Care and Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Middleton Lodge Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Linden House Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Derby

See all care homes in Littleover

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 June 2026 (assessment visit 17 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 19 May to 2 June 2026. This service is a care home providing personal and nursing care for older people, some who may be living with dementia, sensory impairment or physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection 37 people lived at Cedar Tree Care Home Limited.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This focused assessment was carried out to follow up on the breaches of regulations found at our last assessment. These related to the processes used to recruit staff, the provision of safe care and treatment, the processes to ensure proper consent was obtained under the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and the governance at the service.

We found the provider had made sufficient progress and was no longer in breach of the regulations regarding consent, recruitment and governance. However, whilst some improvements had been made in the regulation for safe care and treatment, we continued to find concerns with the care planning and management of behaviours that could cause harm to people or others. Therefore, this constituted a further breach of regulation for safe care and treatment.

Care plans and risk assessments were now more up to date however, this was not consistent. Improvements were still needed to ensure risks were identified when people could have behaviours that placed themselves or others at risk, and to ensure their care plan provided clear guidance in such situations to ensure people’s care was safe and effective. The policy for managing behaviours that could place people and others at risk needed improvement. Incidents were not used as opportunities to learn and improve people’s care.

Staff had now received recent training in the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Records showed where this had now been applied to people’s care decisions however, this still needed further improvements to be made to ensure mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were recorded in line with the guidance.

Staff had now completed recent training in areas relating to people’s care. All the required pre-employment checks had been completed in line with the requirements for people working in care settings.

Cleaning records had now been completed to a better standard and the carpets downstairs had now been cleaned. Carpets throughout the rest of the home were scheduled to be replaced however, there was no specific timeframes attached to this work. Armchairs and dining chairs remained stained.

Records of people’s care were now more accurate however, details of how staff assisted people to re-position themselves to help prevent pressure damage were not consistently made.

Medicines were now stored in line with good practice.

People enjoyed their meals and people’s weight was monitored to help reduce risks associated with weight loss.

Policies had been revised however, some needed further revisions to ensure they were in line with current guidance.

The provider now had meetings with relatives to hear their views and feedback on their actions. Further work was needed to ensure staff views could also be heard and contribute to the development to the service.

Feedback described the registered manager as helpful and approachable. Feedback continued to be mixed over how successful the provider had been in creating a trusting and open culture at the service.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.

  3. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Thelma Dempsey
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 24 February 2021. Latest assessment published 25 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06392588 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Derby City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cedar Tree Care Home Limited provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Cedar Tree Care Home Limited as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Cedar Tree Care Home Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Cedar Tree Care Home Limited.
When was Cedar Tree Care Home Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cedar Tree Care Home Limited was published on 25 June 2026.
Who runs Cedar Tree Care Home Limited?
Cedar Tree Care Home Limited is run by Cedar Tree Care Home Ltd.
What is Cedar Tree Care Home Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01332 767485
Address
Rowley Lane, Littleover, Derby, DE23 1FT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Annefield House Limited (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Littleover Nursing Home (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Annefield House Limited Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    Littleover Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. RI
    Nightingale Care and Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Middleton Lodge Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Linden House Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Derby

See all care homes in Littleover