Rated Care Homes

Sunnybank House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 5 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 336 of 420

    rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Good, like this one.

Sunnybank House: inspection record

Care home, 60 beds, Hampshire

Rated Good in August 2021, up from Requires improvement.

Sunnybank House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Home Park Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Southview Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Brightwater Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Woodrow Cottage Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away
  5. –
    Oaklands House Care Centre Not yet rated, 1.8 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 4 August 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Sunnybank House is a care home providing personal and nursing care to up to 60 people. There were 38 people using the service when we inspected. The accommodation is arranged over three floors. The Rose Unit is on the ground floor and provides residential care for people with less complex needs. Dahlia Unit is on the first floor and is a registered nurse led unit supporting people with a range of more complex clinical needs. Nemesia Unit is on the top floor. This unit had only recently reopened after being redeveloped as a specialist unit for people living with dementia.

What inspectors found

People were safe and we observed care being provided in a caring and unhurried manner. However, we also received feedback which indicated that there were times when staff were not able to be fully responsive to people's needs. Medicines were not always administered as planned due to not being available or out of stock or because staff had not always been sufficiently proactive about overcoming other barriers to administration. Risks to people's care had been assessed and planned for. A range of health and safety checks were taking place to ensure that the building and the equipment within it were safe to use and had been serviced and maintained regularly. As part of CQC's response to the coronavirus pandemic we conducted a review of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures in the home and were assured by the systems in place. There were systems and processes in place to safeguard people from the risk of abuse and to learn from safety related events. We did identify one potential safety related concern in relation to how food for people who required a modified diet was being prepared.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have made a recommendation about how the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) is used within the service.

Staff completed a suitable induction and undertook a wide range of training, relevant to their role. Assessments were completed to establish people's needs and to ensure these could be fully met. People's nutritional needs were met. Staff worked with other agencies to ensure people had access to healthcare services. The design and layout of the building was suitable and had been developed with the needs of people living with dementia in mind. Staff were well informed about the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

We have made a recommendation that the service develop specific DoLS care plans which show how the liberty of people, with a DoLS authorisation, is being promoted.

People told us that staff were kind and caring and treated them with respect. People were supported to maintain their independence and autonomy where able. Staff sought people's consent before delivering care and care plans included information about people's preferences and wishes and the relationships that were important to them.

People had access to a range of events and activities which helped to boost their well-being and keep them engaged and entertained. The number of agency staff used had reduced which helped to ensure that people received care from staff that knew them and their needs well. People's communication needs continued to be identified and planned for. Complaints had been responded to appropriately. Staff worked with local health care professionals to provide responsive and compassionate end of life care.

People benefited from a well led service and the registered manager and provider had shaped a culture where staff strived to provide person centred care. The registered manager maintained a visible presence within the home and actively supported staff and interacted with people on a daily basis. Staff were clear about their role and responsibilities and spoke positively about the registered managers leadership and their impact on the service since their appointment. There were effective quality assurance systems in place that lead to improvements that had positive outcomes for people. People were encouraged to give feedback about the care they received.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 4 August 2021. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
James Greene
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 4 August 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Hartwood Care (2) LimitedBrand: Cinnamon Care Collection
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08454932 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Hampshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Sunnybank House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Sunnybank House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Sunnybank House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Sunnybank House.
When was Sunnybank House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sunnybank House was published on 4 August 2021.
Who runs Sunnybank House?
Sunnybank House is run by Hartwood Care (2) Limited.
What is Sunnybank House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 August 2021.

Contact

Address
Botley Road, Fair Oak, Eastleigh, SO50 7AP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Home Park Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Southview Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. G
    Brightwater Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Woodrow Cottage Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away
  5. –
    Oaklands House Care Centre Not yet rated, 1.8 miles away

See all care homes in Hampshire