Rated Care Homes

Cliveden Manor Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Rated Good in August 2026 under the previous provider, Redwood Tower UK Opco 2 Limited.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in August 2026.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 78 of 113

    rated care homes in Buckinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

Cliveden Manor Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 85 beds, Buckinghamshire

Rated Good in August 2026.

Cliveden Manor Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Meadowside Residential Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Sir Aubrey Ward House Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  3. RI
    White Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Harwood House Requires improvement, 2.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Kingfishers Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Buckinghamshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 August 2026 (assessment visit 15 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 16 July to 12 August 2026

Cliveden Manor Care Home has 2 registered providers, meaning both legal entities are responsible for this service.

Cliveden Manor Care Home is a care home providing accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, and treatment of disorder, disease and injury. The service supports adults with dementia, sensory and physical disabilities. The service was supporting 69 people at the time of our inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service demonstrated a positive culture of safety, openness and learning. Staff reported incidents appropriately, with lessons learned shared across the service and other homes within the provider’s ownership. Safeguarding concerns were managed effectively in partnership with external agencies.

The provider worked well with healthcare professionals to ensure safe transitions of care and continuity of support. Staff knew people well, communicated effectively through handovers, and supported people to access healthcare services promptly. People were encouraged to take positive risks that promoted their independence, choice and wellbeing, while appropriate measures were in place to reduce the risk of harm.

People were supported by a caring, compassionate and well-trained staff team. Staff treated people with dignity and respect, understood their individual preferences and routines, and actively promoted independence. People, relatives and professionals consistently provided highly positive feedback about the kindness, responsiveness and commitment of staff.

There were effective systems for staff recruitment, training, supervision, infection prevention and control, and quality monitoring. Leaders were visible, approachable and responsive, and embodied a transparent, open and honest culture.

The service demonstrated strong partnership working with healthcare professionals and provided people with access to healthcare, therapies and specialist support. People were supported to maintain their health and wellbeing, and the provider demonstrated particularly strong practice in advance care planning and end-of-life care.

However, improvements were required in some areas of record keeping. Care plans, risk assessments and health records did not always contain accurate, consistent or up-to-date information. Medicines records did not always clearly evidence actions taken following missed medicines, and some medicines information was inconsistent. Mental Capacity Act and consent records did not always fully demonstrate compliance with legal requirements.

Further improvements were needed to strengthen environmental safety systems, including oversight of oxygen storage, Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs), water safety monitoring and follow-up actions.

Although staff clearly understood people's needs and care was delivered safely, some staff reported workload pressures and felt staffing levels did not always reflect people's increasing dependency needs.

Overall, people experienced kind, person-centred and responsive care, supported by a positive culture and committed leadership, with identified areas for improvement already recognised and being addressed by the provider.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first full assessment of the service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first full assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first full assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first full assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first full assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask what the new provider has changed since taking over.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Gabriela Smith
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Willowbrook Healthcare LimitedBrand: Avery
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
6655208 (opens Companies House)
Previous provider
  • Redwood Tower UK Opco 2 Limitedregistered

Willowbrook Healthcare Limited runs 33 services in England, 19 of them in the South East. 27 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Willowbrook Healthcare Limited

  1. O
    Camberley Woods Care Home Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Hampshire
  2. O
    Sonning Gardens Care Home Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Wokingham
  3. G
    Ascot Grange Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Windsor and Maidenhead
  4. G
    Bagshot Gardens Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Surrey

See all 33 services run by Willowbrook Healthcare Limited

Getting help from Buckinghamshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cliveden Manor Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Cliveden Manor Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Cliveden Manor Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 85 beds at Cliveden Manor Care Home.
When was Cliveden Manor Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cliveden Manor Care Home was published on 26 August 2026.
Who runs Cliveden Manor Care Home?
Cliveden Manor Care Home is run by Willowbrook Healthcare Limited. It runs 33 services in England, 19 of them in the South East.
What is Cliveden Manor Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01628 401100
Address
210 Little Marlow Road, Marlow, SL7 1HX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Meadowside Residential Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Sir Aubrey Ward House Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  3. RI
    White Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Harwood House Requires improvement, 2.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Kingfishers Nursing Home Requires improvement, 2.2 miles away

See all care homes in Buckinghamshire