Rated Care Homes

Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 37 of 249

    rated care homes in Nottinghamshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service: inspection record

Care home, 10 beds, Nottinghamshire

Rated Requires improvement in May 2026, down from Good.

Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Fosse Way View Care Home (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Aslockton Hall Nursing & Residential Home (Good, 2.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Fosse Way View Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Care @ Rainbow's End Good, 2.4 miles away
  4. RI
    The Old Orchard Care Home Requires improvement, 2.5 miles away
  5. G
    Westcliffe Care Home Good, 2.7 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 May 2026 (assessment visit 25 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment was 17 March to 25 March 2026. The service is a short breaks service providing care and support to adults of all ages, people who are living with a learning disability dementia, and/or physical disabilities. The service was supporting 74 people at various times throughout the year. At the time of our assessment 10 people were using the service. This assessment was unannounced and we completed an out of hours visit to assess how people were supported during the evening.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The service did not consistently ensure care was delivered in line with the principles of Right Support, or Right Care. Where restrictive practices, such as the use of listening devices to monitor people, were in place, there were no records to demonstrate that their use was justified, proportionate, or regularly reviewed, including consideration of whether they were the least restrictive option available. This meant the provider could not be assured that people’s human rights were fully considered or upheld. Care plans and risk assessments were not always accurate or up to date, which meant staff did not always have clear guidance to support people safely. Medicines were not always managed safely. Incidents were not always recorded, reported, or investigated to reduce the risk of reoccurrence. Where people showed signs of distress and required positive behaviour support (PBS) (PBS is a person-centred, evidence-based framework for supporting individuals with learning disabilities, autism, or mental health conditions who may display "behaviours that challenge"), staff did not consistently record these incidents to identify triggers, patterns, themes, or learning. This limited staff’s ability to respond proactively and support people effectively.

The service did ensure that care was delivered in line with the principle of Right Culture: we found there was an open culture for people and staff to speak up. People were treated with kindness and compassion by staff who knew them well. People’s privacy and dignity was respected. Staff supported people to access their local community and encouraged them to make choices about their daily lives, including how they wanted to spend their time and what they wanted to eat and drink. People were also supported to develop and maintain their independence.

The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of safe high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 14 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 14 May 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 14 May 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jane Wardle
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 8 December 2018. Latest assessment published 14 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Nottinghamshire County CouncilBrand: Nottinghamshire County Council
Ownership type
Organisation

Nottinghamshire County Council runs 8 services, all in the East Midlands. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Nottinghamshire County Council

  1. G
    Helmsley Road Short Breaks Service Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire
  2. G
    Holles Street Short Breaks Service Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire
  3. G
    ICDS - Specialist Support Team Good. Home care, Nottinghamshire
  4. G

See all 8 services run by Nottinghamshire County Council

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service.
When was Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service was published on 14 May 2026.
Who runs Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service?
Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service is run by Nottinghamshire County Council. It runs 8 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is Wynhill Lodge Short Breaks Service's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 14 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01949 838492
Address
3 Wynhill Court, Forest Road, Bingham, Nottingham, NG13 8TE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Fosse Way View Care Home (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Aslockton Hall Nursing & Residential Home (Good, 2.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Fosse Way View Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Care @ Rainbow's End Good, 2.4 miles away
  4. RI
    The Old Orchard Care Home Requires improvement, 2.5 miles away
  5. G
    Westcliffe Care Home Good, 2.7 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire