Rated Care Homes

Regency Nursing Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

This rating was carried over from the previous owner after a change of ownership.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 2 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 21 of 29

    rated care homes in Portsmouth are rated Good, like this one.

Regency Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 30 beds, Portsmouth

Rated Good in April 2019, up from Requires improvement.

Regency Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Alton Manor Care Home - Portsmouth Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Bluebell Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Elizabeth House Care Home Adults Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Braemar Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Portsmouth

See all care homes in Southsea

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 11 June 2024 (assessment visit 6 February 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Regency Nursing Home provides accommodation and care for up to 30 older people some of whom are living with dementia.

This assessment was completed following concerns received from an external professional about moving and handling practice.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out an assessment of the service including site visits on 15 and 23 February 2024. The team included three inspectors and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

We spoke with 14 people, 3 visitors and staff including the registered manager, nursing, care and housekeeping teams. We also spoke with a visiting professional. Following the site visit we reviewed a range of documents relating to the running of the service, spoke with the provider and received feedback from a further 3 health or social care professionals.

This was the first assessment of this newly registered service. We considered seven quality statements relating to the areas of risk indicated by the concerns we received. This assessment has not provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

We identified two breaches of regulation relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. The registered manager and provider were open to feedback and demonstrated a willingness to develop and improve the service. The service was registered in October 2023 and systems and processes were still being developed and embedded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    This was the first assessment of this newly registered service.

    This assessment considered the following 4 quality statements: Learning culture; Involving people to manage risk; Safe environments; Infection prevention and control.

    Risks to people were not always managed or mitigated effectively. We identified shortfalls in the management of skin integrity, falls prevention and fluid monitoring.

    Risks associated with the environment had not been clearly documented. There were no recorded risk assessments for the stairwells or free-standing radiators is people’s bedrooms. These presented a potential risk of harm.

    We noted that some equipment, including bed rail protectors and toilet surrounds were damaged. This could lead to injury and would also make equipment difficult to clean effectively.

    We identified improvements needed to ensure the flow of laundry and to minimise the risk of contamination.

    Processes in place to identify learning and drive improvement were not fully in place or effective. This meant avoidable risks to people may not be identified and opportunities for improvement might be missed.

    At this inspection there was no evidence of closed cultures. Staff were able to raise issues and felt listened to and supported. The registered manager was open to feedback and demonstrated a willingness to develop and improve the service. The service was registered in October 2023 and systems and processes were still being developed and embedded.

    This assessment did not include sufficient quality statements to provide a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    This was the first assessment of this newly registered service.

    This assessment considered the following quality statement: How staff teams and services work together.

    A clear admissions process was in place. This included seeking and sharing of information to promote a smooth transfer. Care plans we reviewed showed input and consultation with range of external health and social care professionals. Although some people and relatives expressed a wish for more involvement in planning their care and support, we found examples of people being involved and of staff working with other professionals to improve people’s health and wellbeing. The provider told us a new clinical lead and director of care had been appointed and they anticipated this would improve communication with people and their relatives/representatives.

    This assessment did not include sufficient quality statements to provide a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    This was the first assessment of this newly registered service.

    This assessment considered the following quality statement: Kindness, compassion and dignity.

    People told us staff were kind. From our conversations with staff and observations, it was clear they knew people well and understood how they liked to be supported.

    Some people told us staff appeared rushed and they did not always receive support as quickly as they would have liked. A few people and relatives reported feeling a bother to staff on occasion.

    This assessment did not include sufficient quality statements to provide a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

  4. Well-led

    No rating

    This was the first assessment of this newly registered service.

    This assessment considered the following quality statement: Governance, management and sustainability.

    Improvements were needed to systems and processes to ensure effective oversight and to identify areas requiring improvement. Clearer records were needed to demonstrate effective systems of governance and improvement.

    The registered manager and provider were open to feedback and demonstrated a willingness to develop and improve the service. The service was registered in October 2023 and systems and processes were still being developed and embedded.

    This assessment did not include sufficient quality statements to provide a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Monica Pereira De Sousa Pedro
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
R&D Care Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14654896 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Portsmouth City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Regency Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Regency Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Regency Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Regency Nursing Home.
When was Regency Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Regency Nursing Home was published on 11 June 2024.
Who runs Regency Nursing Home?
Regency Nursing Home is run by R&D Care Ltd.
What is Regency Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 April 2019.

Contact

Address
13 St. Helens Parade, Southsea, PO4 0QJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Alton Manor Care Home - Portsmouth Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Bluebell Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Elizabeth House Care Home Adults Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Braemar Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Portsmouth

See all care homes in Southsea