Rated Care Homes

Admiralty Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 15 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 42 of 59

    rated care homes in Medway are rated Good, like this one.

Admiralty Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 55 beds, Medway

Rated Good in August 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Admiralty Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hawthorn Manor Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Osbern Manor Care Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    351 Maidstone Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    579 Maidstone Road Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Heatherdale Healthcare Limited Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Medway

See all care homes in Rainham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 August 2025 (assessment visit 23 May 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this comprehensive inspection on 17 June 2025. This was the first inspection of this service since becoming a newly registered provider on 16 October 2023. Admiralty Care Home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 50 older people and people living with dementia. The accommodation is arranged over 3 floors. A passenger lift is available to take people between the floors. At the time of our inspection, there were 42 people using the service. The provider was in the process of progressing the registered manager application.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We spoke with people who used the service, their relatives, staff, and the management team. We received feedback from professionals involved in the service. We reviewed people’s care records and documents relating to the management of the service. We observed staff supporting people in communal areas.

Risks to people were managed effectively to reduce the likelihood of harm, and people were safeguarded from the risk of abuse. Lessons were shared when things went wrong. There were enough staff to support people, and staff were supported to be effective in their role. Staff were trained and followed infection control procedures, and the health and safety of the environment was promoted.

People were supported to eat a balanced diet and drink enough to keep hydrated. People had access to the health care services they needed, and staff liaised effectively with other professionals to optimise people’s health and well-being. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives, and staff supported them in the least restrictive ways possible. The policies and systems in the service reflected this practice.

Staff were kind and caring. People were treated with dignity and respect and their independence promoted. People’s needs were assessed and planned for, and care plans detailed people’s individual needs and how to meet them. People’s end-of-life wishes were documented in their care plans.

Complaints were appropriately addressed in line with the provider’s procedure. There was visible leadership, and the service had effective systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ana Ivascu
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Admiralty Care Home LimitedBrand: Agincare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
14965040 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Medway Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Admiralty Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Admiralty Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Admiralty Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 55 beds at Admiralty Care Home.
When was Admiralty Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Admiralty Care Home was published on 1 August 2025.
Who runs Admiralty Care Home?
Admiralty Care Home is run by Admiralty Care Home Limited.
What is Admiralty Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 August 2025.

Contact

Phone
01634 262266
Address
Drewery Drive, Wigmore, Gillingham, ME8 0NX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Hawthorn Manor Residential Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Osbern Manor Care Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    351 Maidstone Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    579 Maidstone Road Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Heatherdale Healthcare Limited Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Medway

See all care homes in Rainham