Rated Care Homes

Kings Court Care Home

I

Inadequate

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 11 of 288

    rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Inadequate, like this one.

Kings Court Care Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 66 beds, Norfolk

Rated Inadequate in September 2026.

Kings Court Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: West Wood Care Home (Good, 4.9 miles away) and Prime Life Limited - 32 South Street (Good, 5.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Heath Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Letheringsett Hall Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away
  3. G
    West Wood Care Home Good, 4.9 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Brackendale House Good, 5.3 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 September 2026 (assessment visit 1 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 03 June 2026 to 03 July 2026. King's Court Care Home is a residential and nursing care home providing care for older people, including people living with dementia, long-term health conditions and end-of-life care needs. The provider had not established effective systems to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of services. Governance arrangements had failed to identify and address a range of concerns relating to staffing oversight, recruitment processes, medicines management, incident management, safeguarding practices and regulatory compliance.
The service was significantly reliant upon agency workers to deliver care. Despite this reliance, the provider could not demonstrate effective oversight of agency staff recruitment, competency, training, deployment or fitness to work. Records relating to agency staffing were inconsistent and incomplete, and the provider was unable to demonstrate that all workers deployed within the service had been subject to appropriate checks or competency assurance processes.
The provider's systems for identifying, investigating and learning from incidents were not consistently effective. Opportunities to identify risks, analyse trends and implement improvements had been missed. We found evidence that management oversight was not sufficiently robust to provide assurance that risks to people were being effectively monitored and mitigated.
Leadership arrangements had been unstable, with one interim manager in place at the service since March 2026. Whilst recent improvements had been made under interim leadership, concerns remained regarding leadership capacity, oversight and the provider's ability to sustain improvement. These failings affected people's experiences of care, particularly in relation to responsiveness, continuity, communication and confidence in leadership.
Whilst many people described compassionate and committed frontline staff, we found significant shortcomings in the systems intended to ensure people consistently received safe, effective and well-led care.
We identified three breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 relating to governance, staffing and fit and proper persons employed. As a result of the concerns identified, the Care Quality Commission took enforcement action against the provider. The provider has started taking positive steps to remedy the issues.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive Inadequate
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary


  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe staffing.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    Inadequate

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated inadequate. This meant services were not planned or delivered in ways that met people’s needs.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, People-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to staffing, and governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 September 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 25 September 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 25 September 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Inadequate on 25 September 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Kingsley Buckingham Lodge LimitedBrand: Kingsley Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13012064 (opens Companies House)

Kingsley Buckingham Lodge Limited runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the East of England. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding, 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Kingsley Buckingham Lodge Limited

  1. RI
    Buckingham Lodge Care Home Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Norfolk
  2. –
    Olney Meadows Care Home Not yet rated. Care home with nursing, Milton Keynes, South East

Getting help from Norfolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Kings Court Care Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Kings Court Care Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Kings Court Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 66 beds at Kings Court Care Home.
When was Kings Court Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kings Court Care Home was published on 25 September 2026.
Who runs Kings Court Care Home?
Kings Court Care Home is run by Kingsley Buckingham Lodge Limited. It runs 3 services in England, 2 of them in the East of England.
What is Kings Court Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 25 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01263 493251
Address
Hempstead Road, Holt, NR25 6DQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: West Wood Care Home (Good, 4.9 miles away) and Prime Life Limited - 32 South Street (Good, 5.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Heath Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. RI
    Letheringsett Hall Requires improvement, 1.5 miles away
  3. G
    West Wood Care Home Good, 4.9 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Brackendale House Good, 5.3 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk