Tanglewood Mews
- Care home
- 7 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2015
- Stanley, County Durham, North East
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
At a glance
3 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.
22 months
since the latest rating was published.
93%
of rated care homes in County Durham are Good or Outstanding (92% across the North East, 83% across England).
Tanglewood Mews: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Westholme (Good, 0.2 miles away) and St Andrews Residential Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Westholme Good, 0.2 miles away
- G St Andrews Residential Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Benton Care Services Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Westerleigh Good, 0.6 miles away
- – Stanley Park Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 December 2024 (assessment visit 10 April 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment 25 April 2024 – 2 May 2024. Tanglewood Mews is registered to provide accommodation for people who require personal care. The service specialises in providing care to adults with a learning disability and autistic people. This was a responsive assessment due to the length of time since the last inspection and receiving concerns in relation to the care provided. We looked at 14 quality statements. At our last inspection published on 7 April 2021, the service was rated good overall, with a rating of requires improvement in Well Led. At this assessment we found no evidence of poor care being provided or concerns with safeguarding. There was enough staff on duty to keep people safe. Medicines were not always managed well. Recording of administration was not clear and procedures were not followed when people took their medicines out with them. Some activities had been taking place, but people told us they would like to do more and go out more. Records of accidents and incidents were not robust to give the manager oversight and to ensure lessons were learned. Records and the process of decisions made with people were not completed effectively. Staff recruitment and training needed more robust records regarding checks and training needs. Staff were not always receiving supervision, appraisal, and induction. The provider, manager and staff worked well with healthcare professionals. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
-
Safe
No rating
The service was not always safe and has moved to requires improvement in this key question. We identified 2 breaches of regulation. Medicines records were not always completed effectively. Systems were not effective in ensuring staff were recruited safely. There were shortfalls and issues with each of the 2 recruitment files reviewed. The service didn't always record incidents in a robust way and lessons were not always learnt. People were protected from abuse, staff knew how to look out for signs of abuse and raise any concerns. Risk assessments were in place and regularly reviewed. Staffing was provided at safe levels.
-
Effective
Good
The service was effective. People were supported to have their capacity assessed and were involved in decisions effectively. Person centred approaches were followed and support plans did reflect peoples likes and dislikes.
-
Caring
Good
The service was caring. People were supported to have improved independence and choice and control was promoted for everyone. Activities were limited however, improvements were made in this area following our visit.
-
Well-led
No rating
The service was not always well led we found a breach of regulation regarding leadership, records and processes. Staff felt supported by management. The organisational culture was not always person centred. Processes in place to manage the service were not always effective or robust.
Ratings by service
The Care Quality Commission rates each kind of service at this location separately.
| Service | Rating | Date | Safe | Effective | Caring | Responsive | Well-led |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supported Living | No rating | Safe: No rating | Effective: No rating | Caring: No rating | Responsive: Good | Well-led: No rating | |
| Care Homes | No rating | Safe: No rating | Effective: Good | Caring: Good | Responsive: Good | Well-led: No rating |
Questions to ask when you visit
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 8 April 2021. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Angelea Hutchison
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing, Supported living service
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)3 inspection reports, latest 8 April 2021. Latest assessment published 18 December 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Autism Care UK (4) LimitedBrand: Lifeways Community Care
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07884044 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Durham County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Durham County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 03000 267 979
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Durham County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Tanglewood Mews provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Tanglewood Mews as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Tanglewood Mews have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Tanglewood Mews.
- When was Tanglewood Mews last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Tanglewood Mews was published on 18 December 2024.
- Who runs Tanglewood Mews?
- Tanglewood Mews is run by Autism Care UK (4) Limited.
- What is Tanglewood Mews's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Contact
- Phone
- 01207 201078
- Address
- Wylam Road, Stanley, DH9 0EJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Westholme (Good, 0.2 miles away) and St Andrews Residential Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Westholme Good, 0.2 miles away
- G St Andrews Residential Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Benton Care Services Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Westerleigh Good, 0.6 miles away
- – Stanley Park Not yet rated, 0.6 miles away