16 King Street
- Care home
- 3 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2024
- Radcliffe, Bury, North West
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
11 months
since the latest rating was published.
6 of 49
rated care homes in Bury are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
16 King Street: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in November 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Kingarth (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away) and Abbeycliffe Residential Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- O Kingarth Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- G Abbeycliffe Residential Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Rose Court Nursing and Residential Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- – Radcliffe Place Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
- G Regency Care Centre Good, 0.9 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 November 2025 (assessment visit 25 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 24 September to 15 October 2025. King Street is a residential care home providing accommodation and support to people who have a mental health condition and have a learning disability or autism. At the time of the assessment, 2 people were living at King Street. The assessment was carried out due to emerging risk.
- Safe No rating
- Effective No rating
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
We found 5 breaches of the legal regulation relating to safeguarding, safe care and treatment, staff training, person centred care and good governance.
Right Support:
Safe recruitment processes were in place. Staff said they had completed training and were supported in their role. Due to the complex care needs of people, additional training would help staff support people in a more personalised, safe way.
People’s prescribed medicines were managed safely. Staff worked collaboratively with other agencies and professionals in meeting the health care needs of people.
Right Care:
People’s records needed further development, clearly reflecting their assessed needs, their involvement and how they wished to be supported in a personalised way. Risk management plans also needed expanding upon, helping to minimise incidents as well as guide staff in a consistent approach. People were subject to lawful restrictions. Arrangements to lessen restrictions needed to be clearly detailed within people’s support plan, along with those involved in the decision and how this was to be supported.
Right Culture:
There have been several changes in management since registering in July 2024. Stable and consistent management was needed to support and develop the service further. Applications to register the manager and remove a condition of registration had been submitted to CQC, as required.
Governance systems and processes needed developing and embedding to clearly evidence effective monitoring to help improve the quality and safety of services provided. Accurate and completed records needed to be maintained to clearly guide and support staff.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safeguarding, safe care and treatment and staff training and development.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to person centred care.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to governance systems.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 21 November 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 21 November 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 21 November 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Mental Health, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- 02 Care Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 14564685 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Bury Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Bury Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0161 253 5151, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday 9am to 5pm, Wednesday 10am to 5pm. Out of hours: 0161 253 6606
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does 16 King Street provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists 16 King Street as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does 16 King Street have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 3 beds at 16 King Street.
- When was 16 King Street last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 16 King Street was published on 21 November 2025.
- Who runs 16 King Street?
- 16 King Street is run by 02 Care Ltd.
- What is 16 King Street's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 21 November 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 07737 098049
- Address
- 16 King Street, Radcliffe, Manchester, M26 1ND Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Kingarth (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away) and Abbeycliffe Residential Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- O Kingarth Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- G Abbeycliffe Residential Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Rose Court Nursing and Residential Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- – Radcliffe Place Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
- G Regency Care Centre Good, 0.9 miles away