Rated Care Homes

Oldham House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 35 of 42

    rated care homes in Oldham are rated Good, like this one.

Oldham House: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 30 beds, Oldham

Rated Good in January 2026.

Oldham House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Beech House Care Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Miller House Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Royton House Care Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Shaw House Care Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Laburnum House Shaw Limited Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Oldham

See all care homes in Shaw

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 January 2026 (assessment visit 22 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 3 November to 2 December 2025. Oldham House is a nursing home registered to support up to 30 people, many of whom have dementia. At the time of our assessment there were 29 people living at the service. The assessment included 2 on site visits, with additional information and evidence reviewed remotely. This is the first rating for this service. This assessment was carried out to provide a rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were protected from abuse and were kept safe. Risks to people’s health and welfare were understood and managed effectively to reduce the likelihood of harm. The service was well maintained and clean, with regular checks of the environment carried out to ensure it was safe. However, some improvements could be made to make it more suitable for people with dementia.

There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. The recruitment process was thorough. Staff received training and regular supervision, which helped to support their wellbeing. Medicines were managed safely. Staff who administered medicines had received training and had their competence checked annually.Care records were detailed and person-centred.

People’s health was monitored, and they were referred to appropriate healthcare professionals when advice was needed. People had enough to eat and drink, with a choice of food offered. Staff sought consent from people and decisions were made in their best interest when they did not have mental capacity. People were treated with kindness and compassion, and staff protected their privacy and dignity. People were encouraged to take part in a variety of different activities.

The registered manager was knowledgeable and experienced. Quality assurance systems in place ensured good oversight of the service. People, relatives and staff were able to provide feedback about the service. Staff told us they received good support from the registered manager.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michelle Wallace
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Wellington Healthcare (Arden) LtdBrand: Bloomcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09448243 (opens Companies House)

Wellington Healthcare (Arden) Ltd runs 16 services, all in the North West. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding, 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 10 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Wellington Healthcare (Arden) Ltd

  1. G
    Arden Court Good. Care home with nursing, Salford
  2. G
    Miller House Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Oldham
  3. G
    Rakewood House Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Rochdale
  4. RI
    Garfield House Care Home Requires improvement. Care home, Rochdale

See all 16 services run by Wellington Healthcare (Arden) Ltd

Getting help from Oldham Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Oldham House provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Oldham House as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Oldham House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Oldham House.
When was Oldham House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Oldham House was published on 6 January 2026.
Who runs Oldham House?
Oldham House is run by Wellington Healthcare (Arden) Ltd. It runs 16 services, all in the North West.
What is Oldham House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 January 2026.

Contact

Address
building 4, 77 Oldham Road, Shaw, Oldham, OL2 8SP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Beech House Care Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Miller House Care Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Royton House Care Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Shaw House Care Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Laburnum House Shaw Limited Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in Oldham

See all care homes in Shaw