Rated Care Homes

Alexandra Villa

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in August 2026.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 43 of 46

    rated care homes in Gateshead are rated Good, like this one.

Alexandra Villa: inspection record

Care home, 2 beds, Gateshead

Rated Good in August 2026.

Alexandra Villa: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Grasmere Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Parkside Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Springfield House Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Alderwood Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Alexandra House Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Gateshead

See all care homes in Central Gateshead

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 August 2026 (assessment visit 28 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

Alexandra Villa is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 2 people. At the time of this assessment, 1 person was living at the service and receiving one-to-one support throughout the day and night.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

The service supports adults with a learning disability and associated health needs who require accommodation and personal care. Support was tailored to individual needs and focuses on promoting independence, choice and control whilst ensuring people remain safe and receive appropriate healthcare support.

Our view of the service

We carried out this assessment on 2 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

The service worked in line with the principles of right support, right care and right culture.
People had choice and control, with care focused on independence and quality of life.

People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Staff understood risks and supported people to live as independently as possible. We observed staff supporting the person safely within their home, offering reassurance and guidance where needed.

Medicines were managed safely, and the environment was clean and well maintained.

People received effective care that met their needs. Assessments and care records reflected health needs, preferences and communication needs. Staff worked with health professionals to support wellbeing and respond to changes in health.

People were treated with kindness, compassion and respect. We observed warm and relaxed interactions. Staff offered meaningful choices and gave people time to respond, supporting them to express preferences about their daily life.

Support was personalised and focused on what mattered to people. People were supported to take part in activities such as drawing and gardening, promoting a meaningful routine and engagement.

The service was well-led. Leaders were visible and staff consistently met people’s needs. Governance systems were in place to monitor quality and safety, and leaders acted promptly to address minor issues and maintain oversight.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions, they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lyndsey Killick
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 3 December 2019. Latest assessment published 4 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Aspire Healthcare LimitedBrand: Aspire Care Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06275755 (opens Companies House)

Aspire Healthcare Limited runs 8 services, all in the North East. 8 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Aspire Healthcare Limited

  1. G
    Aspire Supported Living Good. Home care, Newcastle upon Tyne
  2. G
    Grasmere Lodge Good. Care home, Gateshead
  3. G
    Milldene Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Newcastle upon Tyne
  4. G
    Milton Lodge Good. Care home, North Tyneside

See all 8 services run by Aspire Healthcare Limited

Getting help from Gateshead Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Alexandra Villa provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Alexandra Villa as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Alexandra Villa have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 2 beds at Alexandra Villa.
When was Alexandra Villa last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Alexandra Villa was published on 4 August 2026.
Who runs Alexandra Villa?
Alexandra Villa is run by Aspire Healthcare Limited. It runs 8 services, all in the North East.
What is Alexandra Villa's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 August 2026.

Contact

Address
252 Alexandra Road, Bensham, Gateshead, NE8 4ED Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Grasmere Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Parkside Lodge Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Springfield House Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Alderwood Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Alexandra House Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Gateshead

See all care homes in Central Gateshead