Rubery Court
- Care home
- 8 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2016
- Darlaston, Walsall, West Midlands
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Rated Good at every inspection since 2017.
7 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
36 of 57
rated care homes in Walsall are rated Good, like this one.
Rubery Court: inspection record
Rated Good in October 2019.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Jaytee Care Demi House Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI Bush Rest Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Fallings Heath Good, 0.5 miles away
- G The Willows Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G The Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 18 October 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Rubery Court is a care home providing care for adults with a learning disability and/or autism, physical disability or mental health conditions. The service provides long term and short stay care. The service is registered to accommodate a maximum of 8 people, and five people were living at the home at the time of our inspection. There were also two people living in their own flats on the top floor, with personal care provided by dedicated staff who were managed by the registered manager.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.
The service was a large home, bigger than a domestic style property although it did not present as a care home. Support staff did not wear anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people and transport used by the service was not identifiable as anything other than family transport.
What inspectors found
The Secretary of State has asked the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct a thematic review and to make recommendations about the use of restrictive interventions in settings that provide care for people with or who might have mental health problems, learning disabilities and/or autism. Thematic reviews look in-depth at specific issues concerning quality of care across the health and social care sectors. They expand our understanding of both good and poor practice and of the potential drivers of improvement.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
As part of thematic review, we carried out a survey with the registered manager at this inspection. This considered whether the service used any restrictive intervention practices (restraint, seclusion and segregation) when supporting people.
The service used positive behaviour support principles to support people in the least restrictive way. No restrictive intervention practices were used.
People were safe, and staff were aware of how to minimise risks to people and promote their safety, whilst considering their rights. Staff knew how to work with people to identify risks and change their approach to minimise these.
People were supported by care staff that were caring and expressed interest in people and the support they provided them. People received person centred care and support based on their individual needs and
preferences. Staff were knowledgeable about people, their needs and preferences and used this to develop a good relationship with people.
People were supported by care staff who had the skills and knowledge to meet their needs. There was some need for training refreshers, but this had been identified and training updates had been booked. Staff understood, felt confident and well supported in their role. People's health was supported as staff worked with other health care providers when needed to support people's healthcare needs.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff understood they should support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People enjoyed meals that reflected their preferences and there was access to a range of foods that met people's needs due to their health, culture or specific preferences. People's care plans reflected people's needs and preferences. Staff were able to explain how people were involved to ensure care plans were person centred and involved people and their wider family. We saw the service was responsive to information from people and relatives.
People could complain, and concerns were listened to and responded to by staff. Complaints and comments were used as a tool to drive improvement of the service.
People, relatives and staff were able to share their views with staff. People enjoyed living at Rubery Court and were able to follow their chosen routines and enjoyed access to activities at the service or in the community.
Quality monitoring systems included audits and regular checks on people's satisfaction with the service they received. The provider had systems in place to ensure they kept up to date with developments in the sector and changes in the law.
The registered manager and staff were approachable, organised, listened and responded to them and acted on feedback when they shared this with them. The registered manager demonstrated they wished to improve the service further, for example developing care records further so they would be more person centred.
Outcomes for people using the service reflected the principles and values of Registering the Right Support by promoting choice and control, independence and inclusion. People's support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible to gain new skills and become more independent.
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing, Supported living service
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 18 October 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Rehability UK Support Services LtdBrand: Rehability UK
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 9636282 (opens Companies House)
Rehability UK Support Services Ltd runs 8 services in England, 3 of them in the West Midlands. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 3 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Rehability UK Support Services Ltd
- O Abbeymead Lodge Outstanding. Care home, Gloucestershire, South West
- G Apperley House Good. Care home, Gloucestershire, South West
- G Hannacott Good. Care home, Gloucestershire, South West
- I South Street Inadequate. Care home, Walsall
See all 8 services run by Rehability UK Support Services Ltd
Getting help from Walsall Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Walsall Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 555 2922
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Walsall Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Rubery Court provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rubery Court as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Rubery Court have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Rubery Court.
- When was Rubery Court last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rubery Court was published on 18 October 2019.
- Who runs Rubery Court?
- Rubery Court is run by Rehability UK Support Services Ltd. It runs 8 services in England, 3 of them in the West Midlands.
- What is Rubery Court's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 18 October 2019.
Contact
- Phone
- 0121 285 1171
- Address
- 55-57 Walsall Road, Darlaston, Walsall, WS10 9JS Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Jaytee Care Demi House Good, 0.3 miles away
- RI Bush Rest Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
- G Fallings Heath Good, 0.5 miles away
- G The Willows Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G The Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away