South Street
- Care home
- 8 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2024
- Central Walsall, Walsall, West Midlands
Inadequate
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Requires improvement to Inadequate.
2 months
since the latest rating was published.
The only one
rated Inadequate care home in Walsall, out of 57 with a rating.
South Street: inspection record
Rated Inadequate in August 2026, down from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hawabu House (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Highgate Road (Good, 0.4 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Hawabu House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Highgate Road Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Highgate Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- RI Havencrest Residential Care Ltd Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- RI Bescot Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 18 August 2026 (assessment visit 7 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 7 July 2026 to 17 July 2026. South Street is a care home providing support to adults of all ages, living with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder.
- Safe Inadequate
- Effective No rating
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This assessment was carried out to follow up on enforcement action we took after the last inspection. At the previous assessment the provider was found to be in breach of legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. At this inspection the provider remained in breach of those regulations and additional breaches of regulations were identified relating to safeguarding adults from abuse and safe staffing.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’. This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence and access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the provider was not providing care and support which met with the principles of this guidance.
We continued to find serious concerns with regards to people’s safety. Risks were not always safely managed, and people were exposed to the risk of harm. Staff were not always following risk assessments to keep people safe and care plans were not always accurate or up to date. Health professional advice was not always followed and there were risks to people’s safety from the care environment.
There were continued concerns with the ineffective oversight of the service and poor management which meant risks related to the service were not identified and effectively managed through these systems. People were not supported by sufficient staff to meet their needs and preferences. Systems in place to identify abuse, manage medicines and review peoples care needs were ineffective.
People were not consistently treated with kindness and compassion and were not fully engaged in making choices. People were not always asked for consent to their care. Staff could not always provide care which was person-centred and gave people equity in access and outcomes due to the staffing levels in the home. People were not consistently supported to access the community.
However, staff have access to evidence-based tools to aid assessment and support planning outcomes are considered and goals set for people to achieve. People had individual care plans in place and this took account of their individual preferences, choice and independence. Bedrooms were personalized and people had individual communication plans in place to support them to communicate their needs.
This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we user our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
Inadequate
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.
The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding people from abuse and safe and effective staffing.
-
Effective
No rating
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
-
Well-led
Inadequate
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Inadequate on 18 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 18 August 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Rehability UK Support Services LtdBrand: Rehability UK
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 9636282 (opens Companies House)
Rehability UK Support Services Ltd runs 8 services in England, 3 of them in the West Midlands. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 3 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Rehability UK Support Services Ltd
- O Abbeymead Lodge Outstanding. Care home, Gloucestershire, South West
- G Apperley House Good. Care home, Gloucestershire, South West
- G Hannacott Good. Care home, Gloucestershire, South West
- G Rubery Court Good. Care home, Walsall
See all 8 services run by Rehability UK Support Services Ltd
Getting help from Walsall Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Walsall Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 555 2922
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Walsall Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does South Street provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists South Street as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does South Street have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at South Street.
- When was South Street last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for South Street was published on 18 August 2026.
- Who runs South Street?
- South Street is run by Rehability UK Support Services Ltd. It runs 8 services in England, 3 of them in the West Midlands.
- What is South Street's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 18 August 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 07599 086071
- Address
- 17 South Street, Coldmore, Walsall, WS1 4HE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hawabu House (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Highgate Road (Good, 0.4 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Hawabu House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Highgate Road Good, 0.4 miles away
- RI Highgate Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
- RI Havencrest Residential Care Ltd Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
- RI Bescot Lodge Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away