Rated Care Homes

Lawnbrook Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 7 of 47

    rated care homes in Southampton are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Lawnbrook Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 30 beds, Southampton

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.

Lawnbrook Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: St Annes Nursing Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Ivydene (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    St Annes Nursing Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Ivydene Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Holmhurst Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    White Lodge Rest Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Holmhurst Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Southampton

See all care homes in Central Southampton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 June 2026 (assessment visit 19 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 28 January to 16 March 2026. Lawnbrook Care Home provides accommodation for up to 30 people who require personal care. The service provides care to adults over 65 years living with dementia. The service also supports people with mental health conditions and physical disabilities. At the time of our assessment, 28 people were using the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out a responsive assessment in response to information of concern received in relation to staffing and governance, and assessed all 33 quality statements related to the 5 key questions: Is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

We identified breaches of regulation in relation to safeguarding and governance. Systems and processes to monitor and oversee the service were not always effective in identifying and addressing risks. This included concerns relating to safeguarding systems, environmental safety, medicines management, staff recruitment records and overall governance arrangements.

Records were not consistently well managed across key areas. Systems for the oversight of people’s finances were not sufficiently robust, and records did not always provide clear or accurate information to demonstrate that people’s money was safely managed. Records relating to environmental safety, including fire monitoring, were not always detailed enough to demonstrate risks were effectively assessed and mitigated. Documentation relating to mental capacity and consent was also inconsistent, and recruitment records did not always include all required pre-employment checks.

We also found inconsistencies in leadership and staff experience. While leaders demonstrated a commitment to improving the service and had begun taking action, staff feedback at the time of the assessment demonstrated some staff did not always feel consistently supported, and systems were not yet fully embedded.

Overall, people received positive day-to-day care. People’s health and wellbeing needs were monitored, and staff worked well with healthcare professionals to ensure coordinated care. People were supported to access services when needed, and staff responded appropriately to changes in their health.

People were supported to have choice and control, and there were opportunities for people to engage in a range of activities to support their wellbeing. Systems were in place for people and relatives to raise concerns or complaints.

Staff and leaders engaged openly and transparently throughout the assessment and demonstrated a commitment to learning and improvement. The provider had a service improvement plan and was responsive to feedback, taking action to address the concerns identified and strengthen oversight. However, further time was required for improvements to be fully embedded and sustained.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the findings of this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safeguarding.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jocy Mathew
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 17 March 2022. Latest assessment published 26 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
9735069 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Southampton City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Lawnbrook Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Lawnbrook Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Lawnbrook Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Lawnbrook Care Home.
When was Lawnbrook Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lawnbrook Care Home was published on 26 June 2026.
Who runs Lawnbrook Care Home?
Lawnbrook Care Home is run by Lawnbrook Care Home Limited.
What is Lawnbrook Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 26 June 2026.

Contact

Address
15 Lawn Road, Southampton, SO17 2EX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: St Annes Nursing Home (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Ivydene (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    St Annes Nursing Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Ivydene Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Holmhurst Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    White Lodge Rest Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Holmhurst Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away

See all care homes in Southampton

See all care homes in Central Southampton