Rated Care Homes

Rook Lodge

Care home, Redbridge, 10 beds

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Rook Lodge: inspection record

Care home, 10 beds, Redbridge

Rated Requires improvement in September 2026, down from Good.

Rook Lodge: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016 and 2018, then Requires improvement in September 2026.

Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published 1 month ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 10 Requires improvement care homes in Redbridge, out of 71 with a rating.
  • About the middle for size in Redbridge.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 September 2026 (assessment visit 12 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 30 June to 14 July 2026. Rook lodge is a care home. It provides care and support for people with long-term mental health illnesses. At the time of the inspection, there were 8 people using the service.

This was a comprehensive assessment and included all the quality statements across our five key questions. This is the first assessment for this registered service. At this assessment the service has been rated requires improvement.

Read the full summary

The provider did not work well with people to understand and manage risks. Staff did not always complete risk assessment forms in full, to ensure they contained sufficient detail in the required areas. Where risk management plans were in place, these were not detailed enough to ensure staff had all the necessary information to deliver safe care and support to people.

Staff were not supported through regular supervision, annual appraisals, or spot checks to assess their knowledge, skills, and competence. This meant the provider could not be assured that staff were receiving appropriate support, monitoring, and opportunities to develop and maintain the skills required to carry out their roles safely.

The provider did not always routinely monitor people’s care and treatment to continuously improve it. This meant there was no robust approach for assessing the effectiveness of people’s care, support and appropriate actions were not always taken to improve outcomes. People's needs were not always fully assessed to ensure their physical, mental health, sensory, and social needs were identified and accurately reflected in their care and support plans.

The provider did not always tell people about their rights around consent and did not always respect their rights when delivering care and support. Care plans did not always include signatures from people to evidence consent had been sought before care and support were provided. There was no effective system of record keeping in place. Care plans and risk assessments were not regularly updated to reflect changes in people’s health needs, which may impact the quality and continuity of care.

However, people knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The care people received was easy for them to access and the service worked to eliminate discrimination. People received care that was fair with equal treatment. Reasonable adjustments were made to ensure equal access to the service for all.

The provider made sure medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences. People reported they felt safe with staff and were aware of who to contact if they had any concerns regarding abuse or neglect. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff. Staff told us they felt valued and were treated in a way that supported their wellbeing.

The provider took prompt and appropriate improvement actions in response to the concerns identified during this assessment.

We found 2 breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.


  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety.

    There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and staffing.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this registered service. This key question has been rated required improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Safe was rated Requires improvement on 10 September 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  • Effective was rated Requires improvement on 10 September 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  • Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 10 September 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Contact and registration details

Details for Rook Lodge
Address1-6 Wanstead Lane, Ilford, IG1 3UB
NeighbourhoodWanstead, Redbridge
Phone020 8518 0740
Registered managerElizabeth O'Donovan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Rook Lodge
ProviderCertitude Trading LimitedBrand: Certitude
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number14991207 (opens Companies House)

Certitude Trading Limited runs 11 services in London. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Certitude Trading Limited

  1. G
    138 All Saints Road Care home, Merton
    Good
  2. G
    2-3 Orchard Close Care home, Redbridge
    Good
  3. G
    83 Glengall Road Care home, Redbridge
    Good
  4. G
    Granville Road Care home, Haringey
    Good
  5. G
    Green Lodge Care home with nursing, Redbridge
    Good
  6. G
    Helena Road Care home, Newham
    Good

See all 11 services run by Certitude Trading Limited

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Beehive Care home, 0.7 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    MIG House Residential Care Homes Care home, 0.7 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    Seymour Gardens Care home, 0.8 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    The Beeches (The Drive) Care home, 0.8 miles away
    Good
  5. G
    Sahara House Care home, 0.8 miles away
    Good

See all care homes in Redbridge

Getting help from London Borough of Redbridge

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rook Lodge provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rook Lodge as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rook Lodge have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at Rook Lodge.
When was Rook Lodge last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rook Lodge was published on 10 September 2026.
Who runs Rook Lodge?
Rook Lodge is run by Certitude Trading Limited. It runs 11 services in London.
What is Rook Lodge's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 10 September 2026.