Rated Care Homes

Field House

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 8 of 231

    rated care homes in Staffordshire are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Field House: inspection record

Care home, 7 beds, Staffordshire

Rated Outstanding in October 2019, up from Good.

Field House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    The Pines Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Amber Wood Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
  4. RI
    Abacus Quality Care Ltd T/A Abacus Care Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Carden Bank Rest Home Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire

See all care homes in Horninglow

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 26 October 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Field House is residential care home providing personal care for up to seven people with mental health needs, learning disabilities and/or autism. At the time of the inspection, seven people were living within the home.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The home is two storey detached house that has been adapted for its current purpose a single level property in a residential area of Burton on Trent. There is a large garden and a multi-use Astro turf sports pitch. Public transport is easily accessible and provides links to the local and wider community

The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes that include control, choice and independence.

The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person- centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them. There were deliberately no identifying signs to indicate it was a care home Staff were also discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.

The Secretary of State has asked the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to conduct a thematic review and to make recommendations about the use of restrictive interventions in settings that provide care for people with or who might have mental health problems, learning disabilities and/or autism. Thematic reviews look in-depth at specific issues concerning quality of care across the health and social care sectors. They expand our understanding of both good and poor practice and of the potential drivers of improvement.

As part of thematic review, we carried out a survey with the registered manager at this inspection. This considered whether the service used any restrictive intervention practices (restraint, seclusion and segregation) when supporting people.

The service used some restrictive intervention practices as a last resort, in a person-centred way, in line with positive behaviour support principles.

What inspectors found

Staff were kind and caring towards people and had developed very trusting and mutually respectful relationships with them, knowing them in detail, including their histories, likes and dislikes. The service provided exceptionally responsive, person-centred support and focused on highly individualised support, which had achieved some exceptional outcomes for people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

The registered manager and staff were highly responsive and skilled at helping people achieve positive

outcomes, building confidence, independence and helping develop life skills. People had been introduced to new activities, which had led to the development of new interests, healthier lifestyles and educational opportunities. Through highly detailed and focused care planning and support people had become significantly more independent.

Visiting professionals consistently told us the service was focused on providing person-centred care and support to help people achieve their personal goals and life ambitions. They told us the registered manager and staff had worked collaboratively with other agencies and families to achieve some exceptional outcomes for people that had greatly improved their quality of life.

The provider had safeguarding systems to protect people from the risk of abuse or unsafe care. Staff were aware of the procedures, had received training on it and knew what action to take. We saw that staff treated them with kindness, compassion and respect and made sure their dignity was maintained.

The registered manager and staff team clearly understood the importance of supporting people in their personal and spiritual needs and when they experienced bereavement and loss. Staff were skilful in supporting people to express their feelings.

Staff assessed and reviewed people's physical, mental health and social needs and were supported with the proper and safe use of medicines. Detailed care plans had been developed with the close involvement of the person and where appropriate their families to give a vivid picture of the person and their needs.

The provider had policies and procedures to support the safe recruitment of staff. The registered manager made sure sufficient numbers of appropriately trained staff were on duty throughout the day and night to make sure people received the support they needed.

People received support to maintain good nutrition and hydration in line with their personal choice. People's healthcare needs were well understood and met promptly. Staff worked with other agencies and professionals to support people's health and well-being.

People's communication needs were thoroughly assessed and understood by staff. This helped to support people's communication needs and the Accessible Information Standard (AIS).

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Governance and quality assurance were exceptionally well-embedded within the service. The registered manager and staff used recognised monitoring tools to analyse trends and highlight areas they could work on to improve support for people. Staff felt valued and respected by their manager and included in decisions about service development. They demonstrated consistently high levels of commitment and morale.

The leadership of the service promoted a positive, open culture. The registered manager was open and transparent throughout our inspection and it was evident that the ethos of the home was to promote an open and transparent approach in all they did. The registered manager displayed knowledge and understanding around the importance of openness and working closely with other agencies and healthcare professionals to make sure people had good care.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Olivia Nixon
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 26 October 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09235756 (opens Companies House)

Godfrey Barnes Care Limited runs 5 services in England, 2 of them in the West Midlands. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 4 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Godfrey Barnes Care Limited

  1. –
    Canal Lodge Not yet rated. Care home, Staffordshire
  2. –
    The Meadows Not yet rated. Care home, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
  3. –
    Waverley House Not yet rated. Care home, Derbyshire, East Midlands
  4. –
    Willow Lodge Not yet rated. Care home, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands

Getting help from Staffordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Field House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Field House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Field House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Field House.
When was Field House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Field House was published on 26 October 2019.
Who runs Field House?
Field House is run by Godfrey Barnes Care Limited. It runs 5 services in England, 2 of them in the West Midlands.
What is Field House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 26 October 2019.

Contact

Phone
01283 480810
Address
84 Field Lane, Burton On Trent, DE13 0NN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    The Pines Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Amber Wood Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
  4. RI
    Abacus Quality Care Ltd T/A Abacus Care Home Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Carden Bank Rest Home Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Staffordshire

See all care homes in Horninglow