Rated Care Homes

Chase Park Neuro Centre

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 43 of 46

    rated care homes in Gateshead are rated Good, like this one.

Chase Park Neuro Centre: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 60 beds, Gateshead

Rated Good in October 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Chase Park Neuro Centre: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. O
    The Manor House Whickham Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Coalway Lane Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Abbeymoor Neurodisability Centre Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Wallace House Good, 1.6 miles away
  5. G
    Riverside Place Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Gateshead

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 October 2026 (assessment visit 18 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 25 August to 1 September 2026. Chase Park Neuro Service provides accommodation, personal and nursing care for up to 60 people aged 18 and over, some of whom were living with a neurological condition or dementia. At the time of our assessment there were 53 people using the service. The assessment included 1 site visit, with other information and evidence reviewed remotely.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The assessment was completed to follow up on the action we told the provider to take at the previous assessment and to confirm they now met legal requirements relating to breaches of Regulations 12 (safe care and treatment) and 17 (good governance) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. At this assessment, we found the provider and management team had made significant improvements in addressing the areas of concern identified at the last assessment and was no longer in breach of legal requirements.

Governance systems and processes had been strengthened, which provided greater assurance that risks were identified, monitored and mitigated. Improved quality monitoring arrangements were fully embedded and supported the safety and quality of care delivered.

The provider and management team demonstrated a strong commitment to continuous improvement, working together to enhance service quality and promote a culture of learning and development.

The management of medicines had improved through the introduction of more robust procedures and oversight. A clinical lead ensured arrangements to support the safe administration of medicines were consistently followed. People received their medicines and treatments in accordance with their needs, capacities and preferences.

This assessment found that progress had been made in developing care plans. Care plans and risk assessments contained high-quality, detailed information that was tailored to each person. They clearly reflected people's needs, preferences, life history, personality, and what matters most to them.

The provider continued to use a dependency tool to assess and calculate staffing levels within the service. Since the previous assessment, significant improvements had been made, including an increase in staffing levels and a reduction in the use of agency staff. People, staff, and relatives reported a noticeable improvement in the availability of staff and the overall quality of support provided.

Staff were positive about the staffing changes. They said that strong teamwork and good communication helped the service run more effectively and had a positive impact across all areas. They told us they felt better supported by the management team and more confident in raising concerns, sharing ideas, and contributing to service improvements.

The safety of the premises and infection prevention and control practices were consistently monitored and maintained to ensure a safe environment for people receiving care.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of this/these regulations.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of this/these regulations.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Anthony Saiger
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing, Rehabilitation services
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 2 February 2024. Latest assessment published 2 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07664529 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Gateshead Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Chase Park Neuro Centre provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Chase Park Neuro Centre as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Chase Park Neuro Centre have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Chase Park Neuro Centre.
When was Chase Park Neuro Centre last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Chase Park Neuro Centre was published on 2 October 2026.
Who runs Chase Park Neuro Centre?
Chase Park Neuro Centre is run by Renal Health Limited.
What is Chase Park Neuro Centre's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 2 October 2026.

Contact

Address
8 Millfield Road, Whickham, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE16 4QA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. O
    The Manor House Whickham Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Coalway Lane Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Abbeymoor Neurodisability Centre Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Wallace House Good, 1.6 miles away
  5. G
    Riverside Place Good, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Gateshead