Rated Care Homes

Victoria House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 64 of 88

    rated care homes in Wakefield are rated Good, like this one.

Victoria House: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 30 beds, Wakefield

Rated Good in March 2023, up from Requires improvement.

Victoria House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cherry Garth Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Roop Cottage Residential Home Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away
  3. –
    Stoneybeck Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
  4. G
    Jubilee House Good, 2 miles away
  5. G
    Holly Tree Lodge EMI Care Home Good, 2.1 miles away

See all care homes in Wakefield

See all care homes in Kinsley

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 7 March 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Victoria House is a care home providing personal and nursing care to up to 30 older people, some of whom were living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 27 people using the service.

What inspectors found

The provider had improvement plans in place. However, service design and decoration was in need of refurbishment in some areas. Signage was not in place to assist people living with dementia to orientate themselves around the home. Some people's rooms were not personalised, and some people were required to share rooms. People were offered choice of meals and people told us they enjoyed their meals. At our previous inspection we recommended the provider introduced staff training in line with the Care Certificate standards: at this inspection this was not embedded into practice. Staff had received some training to support people in line with their needs, however some training regarding clinical skills, staff understanding their role and professional development was not provided. Staff told us they were supported in their roles and received regular supervisions. New staff received an induction and shadowing opportunities.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Peoples needs and choices were assessed and documented in person centred care plans, this included people's communication and end of life care needs. We observed staff offering choice to people during our inspection and people told us staff respected their privacy and dignity. The staff team worked closely with external agencies to ensure people's healthcare needs were met. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Systems and processes were in place to protect people from the risk of abuse and avoidable harm. Risks to people were assessed and people and their relatives told us they felt safe in the home. Environmental and equipment checks were in place. However, we found hoist slings were not labelled, with people sharing slings. The registered manager provided assurances following the inspection that this concern was now rectified, to promote safety and reduce the likelihood of cross contamination. People were supported by enough staff who were recruited safely. People and their relatives told us there were enough staff and staff were kind. Medicines were safely managed. The service was clean, and systems were in place to control and prevent the spread of infections. There were no recent accidents or incidents. Systems were in place to monitor and review incidents which may occur.

Staff knew people well. A 'resident of the day' system was ongoing to ensure people were offered the opportunity to provide feedback and auditing of care records was undertaken. The registered manager understood their roles and responsibilities in relation to duty of candour and reported incidents to CQC and safeguarding where required. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. People, relatives and staff told us leadership was good and there was an open and honest culture in the home. The registered manager received support from a regional management team. People were supported to maintain relationships and to receive visitors to maintain their religious and cultural needs. Regular audits were

conducted, and overarching governance was in place. Improvement plans were in place and the service was currently conducting refurbishments of the environment, however not all areas identified during the inspection had been considered.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 7 March 2023. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  2. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michelle Prime
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 7 March 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06764966 (opens Companies House)

Care Homes UK Ltd runs 5 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Care Homes UK Ltd

  1. G
    Oak Lodge Good. Care home, Darlington, North East
  2. RI
    Haven Lodge Requires improvement. Care home, Wakefield
  3. RI
    Stockingate Residential Home Requires improvement. Care home, Wakefield
  4. RI
    Woodley Hall Care Home Requires improvement. Care home, Newcastle upon Tyne, North East

Getting help from City of Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Victoria House provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Victoria House as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Victoria House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Victoria House.
When was Victoria House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Victoria House was published on 7 March 2023.
Who runs Victoria House?
Victoria House is run by Care Homes UK Ltd. It runs 5 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Victoria House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 7 March 2023.

Contact

Phone
01226 727179
Address
2 Nostell Lane, Ryhill, Wakefield, WF4 2DB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cherry Garth Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Roop Cottage Residential Home Requires improvement, 1.7 miles away
  3. –
    Stoneybeck Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
  4. G
    Jubilee House Good, 2 miles away
  5. G
    Holly Tree Lodge EMI Care Home Good, 2.1 miles away

See all care homes in Wakefield

See all care homes in Kinsley