Rated Care Homes

Bulwell

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 46 of 71

    rated care homes in Nottingham are rated Good, like this one.

Bulwell: inspection record

Care home, 22 beds, Nottingham

Rated Good in January 2026.

Bulwell: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Hall Park Care Home Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    Little Acres Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Highfields Nursing Home Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Harrier House Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Park House Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Nottingham

See all care homes in Bulwell

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 January 2026 (assessment visit 20 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 9 to 23 December 2025. The service is a residential home providing support to adults of all ages living with a learning disability and autistic people. The service comprises of 2 conjoined buildings and a separate bungalow on the same site and can accommodate up to 22 people. At the time of our assessment 18 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

  • Safe Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Right Support:

People were encouraged to lead their lives but engagement indecisions about their care was not effectively demonstrated. Independence was encouraged and supported and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were kept safe however this was not effectively documented. Staff understood and managed risk while supporting people. There was little documented evidence that people were supported effectively to safely take part in activities in their local community and try new things. The registered manager made sure staff received training and regular supervision to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and ensured people received the support they needed to take their medicines.

Right Care:

People received dignified care that respected their privacy and human rights; however, support plans did not encourage or prompt staff to ensure people’s privacy and dignity was respected which meant this may not be carried out consistently. Individualised support plans were in place but not everyone’s support plans and risk assessments were completed in full, and the wording used was not always person-centred. It is important to have clear, updated support plans which guide staff to provide appropriate, outcome focussed, and safe care for each person.

Right Culture:

Staff and managers had shared values which were based on supporting people to live happy lives and access resources, including health care, which most people take for granted.

The provider was previously in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance of the service. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of legal regulation.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people consistently kept safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The provider was previously in breach of legal regulation in relation to the safe care and treatment at the service. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  2. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management, and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This key question was previously rated requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    ​The provider was previously in breach of legal regulation in relation to the governance of the service. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jenna Cheung
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 23 February 2022. Latest assessment published 22 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Lifeways Community Care LimitedBrand: Lifeways Community Care
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04126127 (opens Companies House)

Lifeways Community Care Limited runs 33 services in England, 4 of them in the East Midlands. 20 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 9 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Lifeways Community Care Limited

  1. G
    Abbeymoor Neurodisability Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Gateshead, North East
  2. G
    Barleycombe Good. Care home, Suffolk, East of England
  3. G
    Beeton Grange Good. Care home, Birmingham, West Midlands
  4. G
    Cambridge Park Good. Care home, Richmond upon Thames, London

See all 33 services run by Lifeways Community Care Limited

Getting help from Nottingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bulwell provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bulwell as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Bulwell have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 22 beds at Bulwell.
When was Bulwell last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bulwell was published on 22 January 2026.
Who runs Bulwell?
Bulwell is run by Lifeways Community Care Limited. It runs 33 services in England, 4 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Bulwell's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 January 2026.

Contact

Address
Snape Wood Road, Bulwell, Nottingham, NG6 7GH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Hall Park Care Home Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    Little Acres Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Highfields Nursing Home Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Harrier House Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Park House Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Nottingham

See all care homes in Bulwell