Rated Care Homes

Eden House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 149 of 181

    rated care homes in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Eden House: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, North Yorkshire

Rated Good in March 2026.

Eden House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Silver Birches Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Muston Road Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Woodlands Nursing Home Good, 1.6 miles away
  4. G
    Pinfold Lodge Nursing Home Good, 2.2 miles away
  5. –
    Cayton View Care Home Not yet rated, 4.9 miles away

See all care homes in North Yorkshire

See all care homes in Filey

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 March 2026 (assessment visit 6 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 24 February, 27 February, and 4 March 2026.

Eden House is a small residential care home supporting up to 5 older people, younger adults, and people with a learning disability or autistic people. There were 5 people living at the service when we inspected.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The inspection was undertaken due to the length of time since we lasted visited the service.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability or autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The provider worked in line with these principles.

People received good-quality care, with strong, person-centred practice reflected across people’s day-to-day experiences. People consistently described feeling safe, settled and genuinely cared for, and there was a warm, homely atmosphere where individuals felt able to be themselves. People’s comments reflected the stability and trust they felt in their relationships with staff.

Caring was exceptional, with people consistently describing staff as compassionate, respectful and attentive to their emotional and practical needs. People experienced meaningful improvements in health and wellbeing, including reduced anxiety, better weight management and strong social connections.

Staff supported people’s independence very well. People described choosing their meals, managing personal routines, volunteering, taking part in community groups and planning future goals such as employment or moving to supported living. Staff worked in line with the principles of Right support, right care, right culture, enabling positive risk-taking and personalised decision making.

Governance processes needed improvement, particularly ensuring audits, risk assessments and care plans were consistently up to date. Although these shortfalls did not affect people’s outcomes, they limited the provider’s ability to evidence oversight and learning. The provider took immediate action during the assessment to address these gaps. These issues did not negatively impact people’s outcomes, which remained consistently positive.

Eden House remained a caring, inclusive and supportive home where people were respected, listened to and empowered to live the lives they chose.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 8 December 2018. Latest assessment published 13 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Eden House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Eden House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Eden House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Eden House.
When was Eden House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Eden House was published on 13 March 2026.
Who runs Eden House?
Eden House is run by Mr Mark Anthony Cusick.
What is Eden House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01723 512790
Address
14 Station Road, Filey, YO14 9AR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Silver Birches Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Muston Road Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Woodlands Nursing Home Good, 1.6 miles away
  4. G
    Pinfold Lodge Nursing Home Good, 2.2 miles away
  5. –
    Cayton View Care Home Not yet rated, 4.9 miles away

See all care homes in North Yorkshire

See all care homes in Filey