Scorton Care Village
- Care home
- 114 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2017
- North Yorkshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2018, most recently Good in September 2026.
1 month
since the latest rating was published.
149 of 181
rated care homes in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.
Scorton Care Village: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Balmaclellan Good, 1.7 miles away
- G Hillcrest Care Home Good, 4.2 miles away
- – Rosedale Nursing Home Not yet rated, 4.3 miles away
- G Maple Lodge Care Home Good, 4.6 miles away
- RI The Terrace Requires improvement, 4.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 September 2026 (assessment visit 30 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 12 August 2026 to 18 August 2026.
The service is a care home providing personal and nursing care for up to 114 older people, including people living with dementia, physical health needs, and nursing needs. At the time of our assessment, 91 people were living at the service. The assessment was triggered due to an aged rating, last being inspected in 2020.
The provider developed a positive learning culture and used audits, incident reviews, and governance systems to monitor the quality and safety of the service. Staff understood people's needs and risks and worked closely with healthcare professionals to support people's safety and wellbeing. People received their medicines safely, risks were identified and managed, and there were enough skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs. Staff received regular training, supervision, and support to help them provide safe and effective care.
Staff assessed and reviewed people's needs, and care was delivered in line with current guidance and professional recommendations. Staff worked with healthcare professionals and supported people to access health services when required. People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect, and staff understood their preferences, routines and what was important to them. People were supported to maintain interests, make choices about their lives and remain connected with those important to them. Improvements have been made since the last assessment. People were protected from avoidable harm and risks were managed effectively.
The service was well-led. The provider maintained oversight through audits and quality assurance processes; however, these had not always identified or addressed issues in a timely manner. During the assessment, we identified some inconsistencies in care records, including aspects of end-of-life planning and Mental Capacity Act documentation, where information was not always recorded consistently. We also identified environmental issues requiring further action, including flooring repairs, and replacing shower equipment. The provider responded positively to feedback and demonstrated a commitment to continuous improvement. The provider had already taken action, or developed plans, to address these areas.
We found no evidence that these issues affected care received. Overall, people received safe, effective, caring, responsive, and well-led care from staff who were committed to achieving positive outcomes and supporting people to live meaningful lives.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm. -
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this. -
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care. -
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery. -
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Carmen Bacoanu
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)4 inspection reports, latest 6 November 2020. Latest assessment published 8 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Scorton Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 09777972 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from North Yorkshire Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at North Yorkshire Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 131 2131, Monday, Tuesday and Thursday 9am to 5pm, Wednesday 9.30am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4.30pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: North Yorkshire Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Scorton Care Village provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Scorton Care Village as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Scorton Care Village have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 114 beds at Scorton Care Village.
- When was Scorton Care Village last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Scorton Care Village was published on 8 September 2026.
- Who runs Scorton Care Village?
- Scorton Care Village is run by Scorton Care Limited.
- What is Scorton Care Village's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 September 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01748 811971
- Address
- Scorton, Richmond, DL10 6EB Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Balmaclellan Good, 1.7 miles away
- G Hillcrest Care Home Good, 4.2 miles away
- – Rosedale Nursing Home Not yet rated, 4.3 miles away
- G Maple Lodge Care Home Good, 4.6 miles away
- RI The Terrace Requires improvement, 4.7 miles away