Rated Care Homes

Fosse Court

–

No overall rating

No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 80%

    of rated care homes in Leicester are Good or Outstanding (79% across the East Midlands, 83% across England).

Fosse Court: inspection record

Care home, 22 beds, Leicester

This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.

Fosse Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cherre Residential Care (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Abbey House (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Ashton Lodge Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Cherre Residential Care Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Dane View Care Home With Nursing Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Abbey House Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Abberdale Ltd t/a Abberdale House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Leicester

See all care homes in Central Leicester

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 December 2025 (assessment visit 28 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 18 to 20 November 2025. This was the first assessment carried out at this service.

Fosse Court is a residential service providing support to younger people, and older people living with mental health support needs.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service also provides support autistic people and people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The provider was able to demonstrate they were meeting the principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

The provider had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. The manager investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks.

The facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were clean and any risks identified were managed.

There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience to care for people. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervisions to maintain high-quality care.

Medicines were managed safely, and staff had developed positive working relationships with healthcare partners.

Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved relevant people and made decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity. Staff responded to people in a timely way.

Staff were observed to provide, kind, caring and compassionate support. We observed positive, meaningful and respectful engagement.

The provider supported staff well-being. Staff provided information people could understand. People and relatives knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it.

Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive. Managers were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement. There was evidence of positive changes that had been made to the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Peter Juma
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 3 April 2020. Latest assessment published 8 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08099467 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Leicester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Fosse Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Fosse Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Fosse Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 22 beds at Fosse Court.
When was Fosse Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Fosse Court was published on 8 December 2025.
Who runs Fosse Court?
Fosse Court is run by Fosse Court Limited.
What is Fosse Court's CQC rating?
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.

Contact

Address
207-211 Fosse Road North, Leicester, LE3 5EZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cherre Residential Care (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Abbey House (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. RI
    Ashton Lodge Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Cherre Residential Care Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Dane View Care Home With Nursing Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Abbey House Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Abberdale Ltd t/a Abberdale House Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Leicester

See all care homes in Central Leicester