Royal Park
- Care home
- 22 beds
- Nursing care
- Registered since 2018
- Central Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, West Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
2 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
4 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
20 of 63
rated care homes in Wolverhampton are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Royal Park: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in November 2022, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Trinity Court (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Maplebrook Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Trinity Court Good, 0.1 miles away
- RI Langdale and Keswick (Parkfields) Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- G Maplebrook Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G East Park Court Residential Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Lavender Court Good, 0.7 miles away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 17 November 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Royal Park is a care home that provides both short and long-term placements for up to 22 people with needs related to neurological conditions, a brain or spinal injury as well as artificial ventilation and tracheostomies. At the time of the inspection 22 people were living at the home.
What inspectors found
People did not always receive safe care as care plans in place were not always followed. Care plans in relation to emotional distress did not always have the detailed guidance needed for staff to follow. When people had individual risk, these were not always managed in a safe way to ensure people received the support they needed.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice. The systems in place were not also effective in identifying all areas of improvements. Systems were often disorganised, and it was difficult to find information about people as this was not stored or recorded together. Concerns had been identified with the systems however insufficient action had been taken.
There were systems in place to manage medicines, these were followed, and people received medicines when needed. Infection control procedures were followed and implemented. People were protected from potential abuse and when needed action was taken. There were enough suitable training and recruited staff to support people when needed.
Staff felt supported and listened to and people had the opportunity to be involved with their care and raise any concerns. There was evidence lessons were learnt when things went wrong. People had assessments in place which identified their needs so that care could be provided. People enjoyed the food and were offered a choice; people's dietary needs were considered. People had access to health professionals when needed.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 17 November 2022. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 17 November 2022. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 17 November 2022. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Nirmala Rattu
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 17 November 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Kent House (Select) LimitedBrand: Deer Capital
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 09411468 (opens Companies House)
Kent House (Select) Limited runs 2 services, all in the West Midlands. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Kent House (Select) Limited
- G Trinity Court Good. Care home with nursing, Wolverhampton
Getting help from City of Wolverhampton Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at City of Wolverhampton Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01902 551199, Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: City of Wolverhampton Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Royal Park provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Royal Park as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Royal Park have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 22 beds at Royal Park.
- When was Royal Park last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Royal Park was published on 17 November 2022.
- Who runs Royal Park?
- Royal Park is run by Kent House (Select) Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the West Midlands.
- What is Royal Park's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 17 November 2022.
Contact
- Phone
- 01902 870349
- Address
- Major Street, Wolverhampton, WV2 2BL Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Trinity Court (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Maplebrook Care Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Trinity Court Good, 0.1 miles away
- RI Langdale and Keswick (Parkfields) Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
- G Maplebrook Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
- G East Park Court Residential Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Lavender Court Good, 0.7 miles away