Rated Care Homes

Elton Hall Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 5 of 50

    rated care homes in Stockton-on-Tees are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Elton Hall Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 70 beds, Stockton-on-Tees

Rated Requires improvement in August 2026, down from Good.

Elton Hall Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The White House Care Home (Outstanding, 1.3 miles away) and Wellburn House (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Roseville House Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  2. O
    The White House Care Home Outstanding, 1.3 miles away
  3. G
    Wellburn House Good, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
  5. –
    Fairfields Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Stockton-on-Tees

See all care homes in Elton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 August 2026 (assessment visit 21 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 8 June 2026 to 8 July 2026. The service is a residential home providing support to older people and younger people including those living with a dementia or mental health need. This assessment was carried out because of the length of time since our last inspection.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

There had been a very recent change of management in the home. The new manager had identified shortfalls in the service and was working to address these. While improvement was evident in several areas, we found ongoing issues with the management of medicines and the safety of the environment. Governance processes were not consistently identifying or had not yet addressed these issues; therefore, the provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance.

There were enough staff and people received compassionate and timely support. Staff spoke passionately about their roles and demonstrated a commitment to providing person-centred care. Staff felt supported by the new management team and had what they needed to complete their roles effectively. Staff were supported with regular training.

People received personalised support based on their assessed needs and preferences. Care was provided in a way that protected people’s dignity and treated them with respect. Care plans contained information on people's capacity and consent to their care which helped to ensure their rights were protected. However, some information on care files was out of date or incomplete and these records needed updating. While risks to individuals were generally well explored, we found ongoing risks to people due to record keeping and the environment.

Staff worked effectively with healthcare partners to ensure people received the support they wanted and needed. We received positive feedback from visiting professionals saying they felt management were responsive to any issues raised. People were supported to maintain social links and access activities they enjoyed.

There was evidence of a positive and inclusive culture within the service. Staff and relatives told us they had confidence in the management. Feedback was sought and acted on. Staff felt able to speak up with any issues they had. The service worked with the local community to deliver effective care.

Although we did not find evidence of harm to people, the provider had not consistently ensured that systems and processes were effective. The provider assured us about the actions they were taking, and some issues were addressed immediately. We have asked the provider to submit an action plan in response to the concerns identified during this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 3 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 3 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
John Drury
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 5 February 2022. Latest assessment published 3 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Bondcare (Ambassador) LimitedBrand: Bondcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03727583 (opens Companies House)

Bondcare (Ambassador) Limited runs 2 services, all in the North East. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Bondcare (Ambassador) Limited

  1. G
    Cleveland View Good. Care home, Middlesbrough

Getting help from Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Elton Hall Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Elton Hall Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Elton Hall Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 70 beds at Elton Hall Care Home.
When was Elton Hall Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Elton Hall Care Home was published on 3 August 2026.
Who runs Elton Hall Care Home?
Elton Hall Care Home is run by Bondcare (Ambassador) Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the North East.
What is Elton Hall Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 3 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01642 570200
Address
Elton Village, Elton, Stockton On Tees, TS21 1AG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The White House Care Home (Outstanding, 1.3 miles away) and Wellburn House (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Roseville House Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  2. O
    The White House Care Home Outstanding, 1.3 miles away
  3. G
    Wellburn House Good, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
  5. –
    Fairfields Not yet rated, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Stockton-on-Tees

See all care homes in Elton