Rated Care Homes

Fir Trees House

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in September 2025.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 56 of 302

    rated care homes in Surrey are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Fir Trees House: inspection record

Care home, 7 beds, Surrey

Rated Requires improvement in September 2025.

Fir Trees House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Green Acres (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Burgh Heath Care Centre (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    High View Care Centre Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Green Acres Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Burgh Heath Care Centre Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Rosebery Manor Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Nork

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 September 2025 (assessment visit 11 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 28 October 2024 to 16 July 2025.

Fir Trees House is a residential care home providing personal care and accommodation for up to 7 adults with a learning disability. At the time of our assessment, 4 people were using the service, all of whom had enduring mental health conditions. The management team and staff told us 3 out of the 4 people either displayed autistic tendencies or were being assessed for autism.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The inspection was prompted due to concerns we had received relating to the quality of facilities and care provided. Although we identified and observed some of these concerns during the first day of our assessment, we found some improvements had been made by the time we returned to the service on the second day of our assessment.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We identified the provider was not always meeting the standards of care set out in this guidance.

The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to person centred care. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to governance systems.

The premises was in need of refurbishment which was underway during the assessment. We saw evidence that a stair lift had been included in the refurbishment to allow people with limited mobility to occupy the upper-level bedrooms.

There were not enough staff at night to meet people’s needs safely in the event of an emergency. Staff were task focussed and not proactive in encouraging people to live a fulfilled life. Although staff were aware of their responsibility to safeguard people from harm, they were not able to confirm which external agencies they could report safeguarding concerns to. People were not supported in line with best practice guidance or standards, which could lead to poor health outcomes.

However, medicines were managed safely and staff felt positive about the management team.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as Good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to Requires Improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

    We identified a breach of the legal regulations relating to person centred care. People were not encouraged to build their independence or integrate into their local community.

  3. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    We identified a breach of the legal regulations relating to good governance. The provider’s governance systems did not identify concerns with the quality of care people received or the environment.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 1 September 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 1 September 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 1 September 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 22 April 2022. Latest assessment published 1 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03570491 (opens Companies House)

Supreme Care Services Limited runs 14 services in England, 2 of them in the South East. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Supreme Care Services Limited

  1. G
    Croftdown House Good. Care home, Croydon, London
  2. G
    Jericho Lodge Good. Care home, Merton, London
  3. G
    Jubilee Lodge Good. Care home, Merton, London
  4. G
    Liberty Lodge Good. Care home, Croydon, London

See all 14 services run by Supreme Care Services Limited

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Fir Trees House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Fir Trees House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Fir Trees House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Fir Trees House.
When was Fir Trees House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Fir Trees House was published on 1 September 2025.
Who runs Fir Trees House?
Fir Trees House is run by Supreme Care Services Limited. It runs 14 services in England, 2 of them in the South East.
What is Fir Trees House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 1 September 2025.

Contact

Phone
01737 361306
Address
283 Fir Tree Road, Epsom, KT17 3LF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Green Acres (Good, 0.6 miles away) and Burgh Heath Care Centre (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    High View Care Centre Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Green Acres Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Burgh Heath Care Centre Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Rosebery Manor Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Surrey

See all care homes in Nork