Dr Anderson Lodge
- Care home
- 60 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2018
- Dunsville, Doncaster, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
First rated Inadequate in 2020, most recently Good in June 2025.
16 months
since the latest rating was published.
54 of 73
rated care homes in Doncaster are rated Good, like this one.
Dr Anderson Lodge: inspection record
Rated Good in June 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Oldfield House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Eden Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Hatfield House Good, 1.6 miles away
- G Manor View Care Home Good, 1.9 miles away
- RI Stoneacre Lodge Residential Home Requires improvement, 2.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 June 2025 (assessment visit 26 March 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of Assessment: 21 May – 28 May 2025. The service is a nursing and residential care home providing support to older people living with dementia and nursing needs. At the time of our assessment there were 34 people living in Dr Anderson Lodge. We carried out a comprehensive assessment of the service covering all quality statements in all the key questions. We carried out this assessment of the service because of the length of time since the previous inspection and based on some concerns we had received about the service. We found no concerns at the service as part of this assessment.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. The provider reviewed and analysed accidents and incidents to mitigate further risks or harm. The provider shared safeguarding concerns quickly and incidents were reviewed and analysed appropriately. Care plans were detailed and well set out. Care was delivered in line with people’s care plans. Members of staff were recruited safely. People who lived in the care home were involved in the recruitment process and their feedback was used to help the provider make decisions about successful candidates. When we reviewed how medication administered, we found it was generally safe and people received their medicines as prescribed. However, we identified some areas for improvement around how topical patches were applied and rotated. We highlighted this to the registered manager who took immediate action which reduced the risk to people.
People’s likes and dislikes were included in their care plans and any specific dietary advice was shared with the catering team to ensure their nutritional needs were met. Evidence in care plans and daily care records confirmed people had access to local healthcare services and interventions were well documented. People were involved in developing their care plans and we saw evidence of discussions about consent to care and support. Signed consent forms were in place for such things as care, support and voting.
We observed members of staff interacting with people in a kind and caring way. People’s independence was promoted so people knew their rights and had choice and control over their own care, treatment and wellbeing. Members of staff were well supported by the management team and had access to supervision meetings and support.
People’s care plans were person centred and included their personal preferences about how they like care and support to be provided. It was easy for people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. The registered manager knew people in the care home and was aware of where and when people might experience barriers to care.
There was a shared vision, strategy and culture in the care home. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. There was a comprehensive system of audits, quality assurance checks and care delivery reviews in place. The registered managed had a good understanding of governance. The service had good links with the local community and supported active community involvement in the care home. The service had a strong focus on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sara Wilson
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)4 inspection reports, latest 29 January 2022. Latest assessment published 23 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Serenity One LTD
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 11334548 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from City of Doncaster Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at City of Doncaster Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01302 737 391, Monday to Friday, 8.30am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: City of Doncaster Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Dr Anderson Lodge provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Dr Anderson Lodge as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Dr Anderson Lodge have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Dr Anderson Lodge.
- When was Dr Anderson Lodge last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Dr Anderson Lodge was published on 23 June 2025.
- Who runs Dr Anderson Lodge?
- Dr Anderson Lodge is run by Serenity One LTD.
- What is Dr Anderson Lodge's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 June 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01302 350003
- Address
- East Lane, Stainforth, Doncaster, DN7 5DY Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Oldfield House Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Eden Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Hatfield House Good, 1.6 miles away
- G Manor View Care Home Good, 1.9 miles away
- RI Stoneacre Lodge Residential Home Requires improvement, 2.4 miles away