Rated Care Homes

Ashbury Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Ashbury Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 29 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in September 2026.

Ashbury Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Caspian House Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Homelands Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Ashton Manor Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Royal Garden Hotel Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Autumn Lodge - Bognor Regis Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Aldwick

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 September 2026 (assessment visit 10 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Our view of the service

About the service

Ashbury Care Home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 29 people. At the time of this assessment there were 29 people using the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

The service supports older people, including people living with dementia, mental health needs and people with learning disabilities.

We carried out this assessment on 18 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found that the provider was working to this guidance.

People were supported in a service where safety remained a priority. Risks to people were assessed and managed in a way that balanced safety with independence and choice. Staffing levels were reviewed in line with people's needs and staff received training and support to carry out their roles safely. The provider had systems to learn from incidents, complaints and feedback and used this information to improve practice. Medicines were reviewed regularly with healthcare professionals and people were protected through safeguarding processes and partnership working with external agencies.

People received care from staff who understood their individual needs and preferences. Communication needs were assessed and supported through a range of accessible formats, assistive tools and personalised approaches. Staff worked collaboratively with healthcare professionals including GPs, community nursing teams, speech and language therapists, mental health services and learning disability teams to support people's health and wellbeing.

There was a caring culture throughout the home. People were supported to make choices, maintain relationships and participate in activities that were meaningful to them. Staff respected people's protected characteristics, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs and personal preferences. The provider promoted dignity, autonomy and individual choice in day-to-day care.

Care was personalised and responsive to changes in people's needs. People received information in formats that met their communication needs and were encouraged to provide feedback about their experiences. The provider demonstrated a commitment to ensuring people had equitable access to care, support, activities and community opportunities.

Leaders had established governance systems to monitor quality and safety and promote continuous improvement. There was an open culture where learning, staff development and innovation were encouraged. The provider demonstrated a commitment to workforce wellbeing, inclusion and equality and worked collaboratively with external partners to improve outcomes for people.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. One professional described senior leaders as, "proactive", while another said they were, "Always wanting the best for people at Ashbury. They encourage people to live their own lives as they wish and if it involves risk, they handle that really well.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Chloe Isted
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 29 March 2019. Latest assessment published 28 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11419595 (opens Companies House)

Ashton Care (Bognor Regis) Limited runs 4 services, all in the South East. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Ashton Care (Bognor Regis) Limited

  1. G
    Abbots Lawn Good. Care home with nursing, West Sussex
  2. G
    Ashton Domiciliary Care Agency Good. Home care, West Sussex
  3. G
    Ashton Manor Good. Care home, West Sussex

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ashbury Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Ashbury Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Ashbury Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 29 beds at Ashbury Care Home.
When was Ashbury Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ashbury Care Home was published on 28 September 2026.
Who runs Ashbury Care Home?
Ashbury Care Home is run by Ashton Care (Bognor Regis) Limited. It runs 4 services, all in the South East.
What is Ashbury Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01243 824689
Address
124-128, Aldwick Road, Bognor Regis, PO21 2PA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Caspian House Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Homelands Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Ashton Manor Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Royal Garden Hotel Good, 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Autumn Lodge - Bognor Regis Good, 0.2 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

See all care homes in Aldwick