Rated Care Homes

14 Thornholme Close

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 56 of 71

    rated care homes in Manchester are rated Good, like this one.

14 Thornholme Close: inspection record

Care home, 2 beds, Manchester

Rated Good in August 2025, up from Inadequate.

14 Thornholme Close: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Melland House Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Lighthouse Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Beyer Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    The Dell Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Albert Road Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Manchester

See all care homes in Gorton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 August 2025 (assessment visit 9 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 10 June to 25 June 2025.

An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is used by autistic people or people with a learning disability.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The assessment was arranged to follow up on the previous inadequate rating and breaches of regulations in 2022.

14 Thornholme Close is a care home and provides accommodation and personal care for up to 2 people. There was 1 person using the service at the time of this assessment.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

There had been significant improvement since the last inspection and people’s quality of life had been improved as a result of the care provided. People had been supported to improve key areas of their health and wellbeing and to access the local community.

Right Support:

The service supported people to have choice and control. Their independence was promoted, and they had control over their own lives. Staff supported people to take part in activities and to pursue their interests in their local area.

The service worked with people to plan for when they experienced periods of distress. Restrictions were kept to a minimum.

Staff supported people to play an active role in maintaining their own health and wellbeing.

Right care:

People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs.

Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. The service worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse, and they knew how to apply it.

People could communicate with staff and understand information given to them because staff supported them consistently and understood their individual communication needs.

People’s care, treatment and support plans reflected their range of needs, and this promoted their wellbeing and enjoyment of life.

Staff and people cooperated to assess risks people might face. Where appropriate, staff encouraged and enabled people to take positive risks.

Right culture

People led inclusive and empowered lives because of the ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of the management and staff.

Staff knew and understood people well and were responsive, supporting their aspirations to live a quality life of their choosing.

Staff turnover was very low, which supported people to receive consistent care from staff who knew them well.

Staff placed people’s wishes, needs and rights at the heart of everything they did.

Staff evaluated the quality of support provided to people, involving the person, their families and other professionals as appropriate.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment. Improvements were found at this assessment. Environmental risk assessments were now effective, and people were protected from risks found in the home environment. The provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to person centred care. Improvements were found at this assessment. People’s needs had been thoroughly assessed, and staff had been trained to meet these needs.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to premises and equipment. Improvements were found at this assessment. The accommodation was suitable and regular health and safety assessments were completed appropriately.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to staffing. Improvements were found at this assessment. A consistent staff team was in place, and they received the required training and support to meet the requirements of the role. The provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment. Improvements were found at this assessment. Needs assessments were thorough and staff had the required guidance to provide safe care.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulation in relation to good governance. This included a failure to notify the safeguarding team of key incidents. Improvements were found at this assessment and the safeguarding team had been notified of all incidents. However, further improvements were still needed during the assessment to ensure the provider notified CQC of key incidents. This was completed during the assessment and the provider and registered manager now operated effective systems and processes to manage the service safely.

This service has been in Special Measures since 2022. The provider demonstrated improvements had been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.”

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Modesta Kwangwari
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 6 July 2022. Latest assessment published 14 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09266552 (opens Companies House)

Gian Healthcare Ltd runs 2 services, all in the North West. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Gian Healthcare Ltd

  1. G
    Gian Healthcare Good. Home care, Stockport

Getting help from Manchester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does 14 Thornholme Close provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists 14 Thornholme Close as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does 14 Thornholme Close have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 2 beds at 14 Thornholme Close.
When was 14 Thornholme Close last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 14 Thornholme Close was published on 14 August 2025.
Who runs 14 Thornholme Close?
14 Thornholme Close is run by Gian Healthcare Ltd. It runs 2 services, all in the North West.
What is 14 Thornholme Close's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 August 2025.

Contact

Address
14 Thornholme Close, Manchester, M18 7RL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Melland House Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Lighthouse Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Beyer Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    The Dell Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. G
    Albert Road Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Manchester

See all care homes in Gorton