Rated Care Homes

Stone Gables Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    First rated Good in 2019, most recently Requires improvement in September 2025.

  • 13 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 29 of 138

    rated care homes in Leeds are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Stone Gables Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 40 beds, Leeds

Rated Requires improvement in September 2025.

Stone Gables Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Owlett Hall (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Springfield House Retirement Home (Good, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Owlett Hall Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Springfield House Retirement Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  3. G
    Kirklands Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Morley Manor Residential Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Alexander Residential Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 September 2025 (assessment visit 5 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 15 August and 29 August 2025. Stone Gables Care Home is a residential home providing accommodation for persons who require personal care, some of whom are living with dementia. During this assessment we looked at all quality statements. The service was providing regulated activity to 31 people at the time of the assessment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At our last inspection, 28 July 2023, we rated the service as requires improvement. We found medicines were not always safely managed, and risks were not consistently assessed. The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment.

At the same inspection, we found systems and processes for monitoring and improving quality, and systems for monitoring and reducing risks were not always operated effectively. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to governance.

We carried out this assessment to check whether improvements had been made since the last assessment in July 2023. At this assessment we found that the provider had made some improvements to the management of medicines and risk. However, we found that not enough improvement had been made, and the provider remained in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment.

The provider had introduced quality assurance systems but these had not been fully embedded. We continued to identify areas requiring improvement, and the provider remained in breach of the legal regulation relating to governance.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

There were enough staff with the appropriate skills, qualifications and experience. However, at times staff and people told us they felt the home was short staffed. Staff described how they protected people from abuse and how they would report concerns. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse, and they were confident in applying this knowledge.

Care plans and risk assessments were not always person centred as key information was sometimes missing from care files. Some risk assessments and accredited tools had not been completed to monitor outcomes. Although we found gaps within risk assessment records staff knew people’s needs and supported people safely. We identified some people’s needs were not met in respect of management of their skin integrity, personal hygiene, nutrition and hydration. This was mainly due to poor record keeping.

People were treated with kindness, empathy and compassion, and staff respected people’s privacy and dignity. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and staff told us that improvements had begun to be made. One staff member said, “Things are getting better.”

A new management team had recently started to make improvements within the home and were receptive to the feedback given at the assessment. The provider had also taken steps to make improvements by hiring a consultant to develop new ways of working.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 September 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 25 September 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 25 September 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  4. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 25 September 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 28 July 2023. Latest assessment published 25 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04652611 (opens Companies House)

W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited

  1. G
    Morley Manor Residential Home Good. Care home, Leeds

Getting help from Leeds City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Stone Gables Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Stone Gables Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Stone Gables Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Stone Gables Care Home.
When was Stone Gables Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Stone Gables Care Home was published on 25 September 2025.
Who runs Stone Gables Care Home?
Stone Gables Care Home is run by W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited. It runs 2 services, all in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Stone Gables Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 September 2025.

Contact

Address
Street Lane, Gildersome, Morley, Leeds, LS27 7HR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Owlett Hall (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Springfield House Retirement Home (Good, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Owlett Hall Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Springfield House Retirement Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  3. G
    Kirklands Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Morley Manor Residential Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Alexander Residential Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Leeds